Talk:K9 (Doctor Who)/Archive 1

Archive 1

Ontological Paradox?

Does the circuitboard thing necessarily constitute an ontological paradox? We don't know that the circuitboard used by the Doctor for K-9 Mk III is the same one used by Marius for Mk I, or that it's identical to or based on Marius's design. --Jay (Histrion) 15:14, 16 August 2005 (UTC)

The story was certainly trying to imply that Marius either reverse-engineered the Mk III motherboard or used the components to come up with K-9 Mk I circuitry, so ultimately the knowledge of how to construct the original motherboard is a loop, even if modifications were made along the way, i.e. Mk I -> modified Mk II -> modified Mk III -> reverse engineered to provide the basic design for the Mk I. --khaosworks (talk • contribs) 15:37, August 16, 2005 (UTC)

And even if the Doctor designed a completely new circuitboard, it was still inspired by and created for the basic K9 unit. I suppose it sort of adds an extra step to the paradox - Marius discovers the circuit board and has the idea for K9, the Doctor takes the idea for K9 and designs the circuit board. I suppose that might make it a normal predestination paradox instead, but I think an ontological is more likely. If the Doctor's trying to upgrade K9, he's not going to design a new circuitboard utterly and completely independent of the one that came before - if he was at all influenced by K9II's board (and how could he not be?), then there are some elements of it that have no apparent creator, and it's an ontological paradox. (Wow, I just seriously geeked out.) --Brian Olsen 15:42, August 16, 2005 (UTC)

Re If the Doctor's trying to upgrade K9, he's not going to design a new circuitboard utterly and completely independent of the one that came before -- I dunno, if anyone would, it would be the Doctor. "No, no, no, this is completely all wrong!" Heh heh. --Jay (Histrion) 15:28, 17 August 2005 (UTC)

Personally, I think a robot dog called K-9 is rather amusing. Canine, K-9, gettid? Darkwarlock999

Interference

Shouldn't there also be a reference to his appearance in the EDA Interference? It does contradict some of the other appearances, though, as it's stated there that K-9 Mark III was designed specifically to be repairable using the technology of the 80s and 90s. NickBarlow 23:22, 26 August 2005 (UTC)

Source of second unit?

"However, the Doctor had somehow obtained K-9's schematics, as he built a second K-9 unit."

Is there any reference for this? I don't recall the Doctor ever stating that he got the second K-9 unit by building it. Ken Arromdee 15:50, 18 October 2005 (UTC)

All the rage in Trenton, New Jersey

Khaosworks removed an anon's addition of the following:

In The Stones of Blood, a human was shocked and surprised to see K-9. The Fourth Doctor informed him that it was an electronic dog and further assured him that, "It's all the rage in Trenton, New Jersey."

Aside from getting Prof. Rumford's gender wrong, I think it's a cute bit of trivia that says a bit about the attitude of characters towards K-9. Can we find a better place for it in the article? —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 15:56, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

I still think this is worth inclusion somewhere, but won't do it unless somebody else agrees... —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 07:23, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

Maybe as a featured quote? 23skidoo 16:13, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

I've put it in — if anyone objects strongly, take it right out again. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 18:21, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

Mark IV?

I'm uncertain about the article's reference to the proposed late-90s version of K-9 as the Mark IV. Isn't that a bit OR-ish? The link that's provided is to a file named k9_mk5.jpg, which muddies the water even further. If anyone has any info (from old Doctor Who Magazines, for instance) about the proposed series, perhaps we could incorporate the image into a discussion of it (if fair use permits). I'm just not entirely certain that Interference is the best context in which to introduce that version. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 07:23, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

I believe David Tennant referred to the K-9 incarnation in School Reunion as mark III (this was said in the Tooth and Claw episode commentary). This would make sense as if it was a gift to Sarah Jane Smith then she probably still has him with her (and brought her along to the school?) —Liyster 05:24, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, the one in School Reunion is Sarah Jane's Mark III. The question I was asking was about the one about which the article currently says this:

"A new K-9 model was designed for a possible television project in the 1990s that never materialised, and drawings of this model have been identified in some fan circles as the "Mark IV".

In light of the new K9 Adventures series, I'm inclined to remove that sentence altogether, or at least move it to the next section. (The 1990s project may well have been an ancestor of K9 Adventures, and could better be discussed in that context than in the context of the novels.) In fact, I'll be bold and do that — anyone who disagrees can revert with impunity. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 05:50, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

As an aside, it's interesting to compare the proposed 1990s version to the newly announced 2006 model. The 1990s version looks like an old boom box, and there's something very iPod about the new version! Or should I say iPup? —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 05:59, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

The Five Doctors

I accidentally submitted the change before I was finished with the edit summary. Anyway, I put "The Five Doctors" back in, with a mention that it's a cameo appearance. It's as notable as many of the other serials listed (he barely appears in some of them, stuck in the TARDIS), plus it confirmed "K-9 and Company" as canon, which sets up his appearance in "School Reunion." --Brian Olsen 15:47, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

List of appearances query

I'll probably be starting on the list of appearances for K-9 soon, but here's a question: should I distinguish between Mark I and Mark II, etc., within each medium, or create separate lists for each of the variants? Or should I forgo the distinctions entirely? Any thoughts would be appreciated. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 01:58, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

Probably neater to distinguish within each medium, especially since when we get to Gallifrey it's both of them. --khaosworks (talk • contribs) 02:32, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

Also worth mentioning (perhaps), K-9 made a cameo in James Burke's Connections.

K-9 Mark II's 's first appearance

Just a small hair to split. Regarding the first time that we see K-9 Mark II. He doesn't actually appear in The Invasion of Time. The Fourth Doctor rolls out a large crate with that label on it at the end of episode six. His first on screen appearance is in The Ribos Operation. I am noting this because the info in the box at the beginning of the article lists TIoT while the list of appearances towards the bottom has TRO as his first serial. As this may be a bit confusing for new fans of the show that come to these pages I thought that it might be worth starting a conversation here to come to a consensus about how this should be noted. Just to get the ball rolling I would vote for TRO as, I suspect, that the box used in TIoT is empty (no real evidence mind you - it is just a suspicion). Cheers to all. MarnetteD | Talk 15:06, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

I agree completely - even if he is in the box, we don't actually see him. But I don't think it's a major enough point to require concensus. I'm going to be bold and make the change; someone can revert if they feel like it requires discussion. --Brian Olsen 19:50, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

"Ribos" as first appearance makes sense to me. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 20:10, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

WIKIA PROJECT DOGS????

hes not a real dog or a real fiction dog because his a robot Sailor cuteness 13:57, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

"a real fiction dog"? DrWho42 15:21, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

hmm your rite sorry i should have used better words I ment real fiction dogs like lassie who are real dogs k9 is a robot in the shape of a dog thats what i ment sorry it came out wrong :} Sailor cuteness 21:11, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

Anne Robinson

Edokter recently added this to the bit about K-9's appearance on The Weakest Link: "...much to the dismay of Anne Robinson, who was visibly smitten by K-9 by virtue of calling her "Mistress"." While I agree that's probably a fair (and amusing) assessment of Robinson's reaction, I'm worried that "visibly smitten" and the explanation are too POV. Can anyone think of a better way to word this, while still retaining the "Mistress" joke? —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 23:54, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

Changed it to "noticably charmed". — Edokter • Talk • 21:45, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

Proof for the name K9 - mark 4

if you watch part two of the sarah jane adventures story "The Lost Boy" on the safe where K9 is kept it says Mark IV on the lock on it, we should make approriate edits to this page soon, unless anyone has anything else to say about it.--Wiggstar69 (talk) 23:19, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

I say Mark IV. The IIIb seems to come from some toy. — Edokter • Talk • 08:51, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

At the time the edits were made to list the model as Mark IIIb, the reasoning was based on the documentation that came with the 1/4 scale RC K-9 toy, yes. At that time it was the only thing close to an official designation that had been given. However, if the SJA show has given evidence that it is in fact Mark IV, then I say go with what the show states. Though I'd be rather curious as to how K-9 could both be in the safe and taking care of the black hole situation. Could it possibly be a spare body? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.135.47.36 (talk) 19:20, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

The black hole is stored in that safe (don't ask how). — Edokter • Talk • 19:24, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

The name that appears in the show is what we have to go by. Only what appears on the air is canon. Even if it's not Doctor Who, it's a recognized Doctor Who spinoff. -- Wryspy (talk) 18:40, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

First, what is SJA? I am in the US and have no idea. Is it an official Doctor Who media? Also, could you please source what the show says? —70.240.90.173 (talk) 01:44, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

SJA = The Sarah Jane Adventures, an official BBC spin-off from Doctor Who, made by the same producers and set in the same universe. Anything attributed to SJA is therefor considered 'official' and a reliable source. In last season's final episode, "Mark IV" was clearly seen on the vault where K-9 was sealing the black hole. — Edokter • Talk • 02:19, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Hate to bring back an old topic here, but a screencap from Journey's End [1] has a good clear shot of the safe in SJ's attic, and the only thing on the safe are a lock dial and a handle to open. No sign of a "IV" anywhere on it. Kind of doubtful that they wouldn't be using the same set as SJA, so that has to be the same safe prop. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.135.47.36 (talk) 23:41, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

"The Lost Boy" had a closeup of the safe not seen in "Journey's End"; it clearly read "Mark IV". — Edokter • Talk • 18:26, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Can you provide a screenshot of this? Because the one above is the same safe used in "The Lost Boy". It matches up location wise. I'm willing to accept that I have perhaps overlooked the "Mark IV" when viewing the episode, but so far no one has been able to provide any evidence of it being there other than "I saw it, you didn't." I have no problem conceding if I'm wrong, I just need evidence of it.--216.135.47.36 (talk) 20:11, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

Withdrawing previous comment, cause after reviewing further into the ep, I found what everyone else was referring to, [2]. "Mark IV Handle"

Guess that could be taken as naming K-9.... --12.219.171.207 (talk) 22:37, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Aha. Thank you. I withdraw my argument then.--216.135.47.36 (talk) 19:09, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

teleport/omni flexible hyperlink facilities

is it possible that the omni flexible hyperlink facilities k9 has is the teleport? it kinda sounds like it might be (word wise) and if it isnt then k9 probably would have said about it in school reunion81.108.233.59 (talk) 17:13, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Mark IV last appearence

Zythe keeps commenting out K-9 Mark IV's last appearence from the infobox, even though it is quite likely we will never see him again. And even so, it can always be updated. Before I revert again, I'd like some input. — Edokter • Talk • 17:25, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

My point is we have no source that it's a last appearance so having a "most recent appearance" section is a bit useless. In fact, separating appearances by model of K-9 is a very in-universe way of sorting things and goes against Wikipedia:Manual of Style (writing about fiction).~Zythe^{Talk to me!} 21:18, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

I disagree there; MoS does not say anythin about what to include in the article. And as long as there are no sources for future appearences either, I see absolutely no reason not to include it. — Edokter • Talk • 23:36, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

MoS says to focus on real world information. Whenever Mark II debuted or Mark III stopped appearing is irrelevant. It belonges on Wikia, not Wikipedia.~Zythe^{Talk to me!} 17:07, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

We have no reasoning for saying its his last appearence, anyway his getting his own show, so we know he'll be back in some form.--Wiggstar69 19:42, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

The reason I removed K-9's last appearance is because of the high plausibility of being a recurring character in series 2 (if SJA is renewed). Compare with Romana or pre-announcement Rose, where there is/was very little chance that their respective actresses would reprise the role. Will ^(talk) 01:25, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

In reply to Will first, the likelihood of K-9 being in Series 2 is certainly not 'high' - the nearer the K-9 series gets, the more contentious the rights to use the character will become. In reply to the point made about the different models - they are effictively 4 different characters and so first and last appearances for each should be maintained. Mark I elected to remain with Leela, Mark II with Romana, Mark III sacrificed itself whilst Mark IV is tending to a black hole. I would think putting The Lost Boy as Mark IV's final appearance to date is not unreasonable. Surely it is pure speculation that he may continue in the series beyond this episode? He may well do, but for now that is speculation. As Edokter says, it can always be updated, much as Rose has recently been... Wolf of Fenric (talk) 00:07, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

Appropriate pronoun

I know editors so far have used 'it' to refer to K-9, but I'm aware that dialogue in the series always referred to the character (as opposed to the prop) as 'he'. That seems to be generally reflected in behind-the-scenes discussions by those who made the programme, too. I find it slightly more difficult to parse the 'it' version - would it be legitimate to switch to a personal pronoun? I note that's the solution used in, say, R2-D2, although of course that doesn't oblige us to go the same way. 81.159.92.241 (talk) 18:33, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Image

Shouldn't the main image be one of Mark IV, if at all possible? It's the most recent appearance of the character, which is normally the one chosen. Alternatively, there could be an image similar to that of the Doctor (Doctor Who) and also companions- showing all 4 appearances, even if they are very similar. If suitable pictures are unavalible, then the current one works fine.SCIAG (talk) 15:51, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Mk I/ Mk II transition

Does no one else find the following (from the Mk I paragraphs of the “Models” section): "However, once inside the TARDIS, the Fourth Doctor produced a box labeled K-9 Mark II. This K-9 is set to be the star of the forthcoming 2009 K-9 television series". For a start, the bit about the Mk II crate should be the start of the Mk II para, not the end of the bit about Mk I - the Mk I not being a feature of this scene, and having departed already. But the bigger question is "which" model the use of "this K-9" is referring to: the Mk I, because it is in the Mk I section, or the Mk II, because this is the one in crate?? It needs to be clarified. Jock123 (talk) 14:20, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

Anatomy

Your comment is an exaggeration. Every button is not described in that section.Attimo54321 (talk) 15:01, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

The deleted anatomy section seems to provide interesting information that is not expressed in the bio, and not necessarily clear from simply looking at the photos. Not sure why it was deleted. Attimo54321 (talk) 02:05, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

We do not need to describe every button and antenna on K-9. We are an encyclodepia, not a fan-site. — Edokter • Talk • 14:14, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

K9 Mark 1/Mark 2

In K9's POV during the bootup sequence of his regeneration in hte episode aired on Disney XD ast week, I appears the new K9 is "Mark 2". Should we mention this in the article?

Screencaps:

Right after renegeration process starts

Mark 2 is selected and the process continues

So it appears Mark I (or 1) is the one blown up and it regenerates into Mark 2, unaware of the Mark II with Romana.

So is this all a little too fanwanky or shoudl it be in?

Etron81 (talk) 13:32, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Really???

There is not a single mention of the word "canine" in this whole article... wow. I'll leave this here for possible opinions before adding the obvious connection. Hearfourmewesique (talk) 15:12, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

One character or multiple?

The lead section continually switches between saying that there are multiple characters with this name and using terms like "he" or "this character" as if the article is about a single character. It's very confusing for readers who are unfamiliar with the subject and should really be made more consistent. -- Fyrefly (talk) 17:41, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

K9

Surely K9 is the standard spelling? Timrollpickering 09:17, 1 Dec 2004 (UTC)

I'm going by what's on the side of his body. K-9 is how I've seen it spelled throughout Wikipedia so far. -khaosworks 13:50, 1 Dec 2004 (UTC)

If we see what's written on the side of his body it's typically k.9, while this may refer to a dash, it is not obvious. The tardis wikia, speels it primarily k9 with the central dot or hyphen as alternate spellings.

Could someone check in the encyclopedia by Justin Richards as I think this should be a pretty reliable source. There is no real consensus online. Also a good idea to check with DWM. K9doggy (talk) 11:14, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Please note, this thread is over eight years old. --Redrose64 (talk) 14:28, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Information on the original creators of the K-9 Model at the BBC

What would be the best way to include this information (persons responsible for building the original K-9 for the BBC Visual Effects Dept.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.151.163.21 (talk) 20:27, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

K-9 Mark IV or V?

In the "Mark IV" section, several references are made to a "Mark V". As I have not watched much of the SJA, I am unsure if this is a typo or correct. If it is correct, why is there not a separate section for the Mark V? Vyselink (talk) 02:26, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

We need reliable sources that explicitly state "Mark V". --Redrose64 (talk) 11:11, 13 January 2015 (UTC)