Talk:KABOOM! (non-profit organization)

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Promotional? COI?

edit

This article seems rather promotional, which would probably be explained by this elance request posted the day before this was written. ThemFromSpace 08:38, 24 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

  • I'm the primary author of this page. Themfromspace wrote on my talk page, so I figured I would respond here. I had absolutely no idea that there was a request out there that the page be written. I wrote this page because I've been very active in writing about articles related to the TV show Parks and Recreation (you can see my user page for some of those contributions) and I wrote the page about the episode Kaboom (Parks and Recreation), just as I've written the pages for all 26 (so far) P&R episodes. The organization was featured in that episode, and I thought they sounded interesting, so I wrote the page up. I'm not involved in the organization at all, don't know anybody involved with it. I didn't know about the posting, nor did I collect any compensation for writing this article. The timing of the posting is an incredible coincidence, but that's all it is: a coincidence. (Although I do want to point out WP:AFG here, I bear no grudge against Themfromspace for suspecting I had some sort of COI interest. The timing would have made me suspicious as well.) If you'll look at my userpage, I think you'll see I have a pretty significant record of contributions; it's not as if I started an account just to make this page. Plus, the article is thoroughly sourced. If the prose of the article needs rewording in order to make it seem less promotional, please point out some examples and I'll work on them. But otherwise, I will likely remove the promotional tag in a few days, because there was no COI in the writing of this article. — Hunter Kahn 16:23, 24 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
Ok, thanks for the explanation. The timing is still odd, to be sure, but I'll AGF and remove the COI tag. The major "promotional" aspect is that it seems like a play-by-play account of the organisation's history as told by every media appearance it has made, instead of an overall summary of who they are. But there's no individual statements that are especially glowing, just an impression from the general flow of the article. ThemFromSpace 20:14, 24 April 2010 (UTC)Reply


Darell Hammond

edit

I deleted the Darell Hammond material, since there is an entire article devoted to that subject and this material was just redundant.   Will Beback  talk  09:40, 9 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on KaBOOM! (non-profit organization). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:20, 4 December 2017 (UTC)Reply