![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Other definitions
editI don't mean to be rude, but the Urban Dictionary has an alternate definition for this entry: http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=kmfa Perhaps you could include it. MAC 20:50, September 4, 2006 (UTC)
Article length and copyvio
editWhile the current May29th KMFA article is better than the stub that existed prior to May 15th 2008. As the tag says... it's a bit wordy for Wikipedia. Also... the entire article is a copy of "About Us" page from KMFA's own web site. So... these are questions to Rich, Julian88Tex, and anyone else who works for KMFA:
- Does KMFA release their descriptive copy into the public domain? The KMFA About Us page explicitly states that all of the text currently being used is "© 2006 kmfa. All rights reserved"... Meaning, that I have have a mind to revert the article to the stub that it was for copyright infringement.
- Also... if we are going to the effort of asking KMFA to release the copyright on their "About" text, then we might as well ask them to release the logo into a GFDL or a CC-by license with a declaration of consent.
So really... I like KMFA. There are few things better than waking up, realizing that it is Sunday morning, and then listening to Ancient Voices with Sara Hessel. However copyright violations are uncool. Thoughts? Comments? Azoreg (talk) 23:35, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
- I emailed KMFA... and they asked me to remove the offending material:
- Please go ahead and remove the copyrighted material from KMFA's
- Wikipedia entry. Thank you!
- Judy Watts <[email protected]>
- Development Associate | Webmaster
- Classical 89.5
- 512.476.5632
- www.kmfa.org
- So, I removed most all of the edits since from today back to May 15th 2008 Azoreg (talk) 22:11, 23 June 2008 (UTC)