Talk:KNHL

Fair use rationale for Image:KHAS.gif

Image:KHAS.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 18:40, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Adding unreferenced entries of former employees to lists containing BLP material

Hello, Please do not add unreferenced names as entries to the list of former employees in articles. Including this type of material in articles does not abide by current consensus and its inclusion is strongly discouraged in our policies and guidelines. The rationales are as follows:

1. WP:NOT tells us, Wikipedia is "not an indiscriminate collection of information." As that section describes, just because something is true, doesn't necessarily mean the info belongs in Wikipedia.
2. As per WP:V, we cannot include information in Wikipedia that is not verifiable and sourced.
3. WP:Source list tells us that lists included within articles (including people's names) are subject to the same need for references as any other information in the article.
4. Per WP:BLP, we have to be especially careful about including un-sourced info about living persons.

If you look at articles about companies in general, you will not find mention of previous employees, except in those cases where the employee was particularly notable. Even then, the information is not presented just as a list of names, but is incorporated into the text itself (for example, when a company's article talks about the policies a previous CEO had, or when they mention the discovery/invention of a former engineer/researcher). If a preexisting article is already in the encyclopedia for the person you want to add to a list, it's generally regarded as sufficient to support their inclusion in list material in another article. cheers Deconstructhis (talk) 13:53, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Ratings

I just marked the ratings section as needing a reference. While I understand much of this article is unreferenced, claiming specific viewership numbers is definitely a statement that can be challenged, and thus needs to have a solid, reliable source. If such a source isn't provided eventually, I'll have to remove the entire section, because this type of a claim must be verified. Qwyrxian (talk) 07:32, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on KNHL. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140714231517/http://www.khastv.com/story/khas-tv-ksnb-tv-information-20140611 to http://www.khastv.com/story/khas-tv-ksnb-tv-information-20140611
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.northpine.com=september/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:55, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Update needed

It's too bad the sources are lacking… but I highly doubt Gray is operating a SonLife station. I'd have thought Gray stating in a community issues report to the FCC that "All programming on KSNB simulcasts on KNHL-DT", below a list of newscasts "On KSNBDT1/KNHLDT2", and that the only SonLife programs listed anywhere in the report aired during January and February prior to Gray taking control of KNHL, would be sufficient, but apparently not. (This may be in part because the report does stop short of actually saying what's on channel 5.1 [we can't have any original research, after all, and there is mention of what is "on KSNB DT2 (a simulcast of KOLNDT3)" without any mention of any KNHL carriage of its programming], KSNB-TV is still going by "KSNB Local 4" [notwithstanding the fact that KSNB's Hastings studio and KNHL's transmitter are co-located, a remnant of the KHAS-TV days when channel 5 had the studio and NBC programming that now belong to KSNB], any press releases/announcements don't seem to be forthcoming [I'm not holding my breath], and the complete lack of any other sources thus far.) --WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:33, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

I do note as well that KNHL's latest children's programming report reflects a main-channel MeTV affiliation, as well as Ion on .4 (and The CW on .3, but that one was announced and launched many months ago under an interm lease). --WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:42, 7 April 2019 (UTC)