Talk:KRWB (AM)

Minnesota Low‑importance

	Minnesota portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Minnesota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Minnesota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MinnesotaWikipedia:WikiProject MinnesotaTemplate:WikiProject MinnesotaMinnesota articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Radio Stations

	Radio portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio Stations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of radio stations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Radio StationsWikipedia:WikiProject Radio StationsTemplate:WikiProject Radio StationsRadio station articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Add more information

Latest comment: 18 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Why was an article created for KRWB as a stub? And I don't think it should be listed in the AM radio in Grand Forks template, since it doesn't even come in in Grand Forks. At least if you make an article, put some more information in it.--milk the cows (Talk) 21:51, 13 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Grand Forks was the closest market. And why not create an article? It at least shows that the station exists. --Sable232 00:15, 14 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

I can see that. I understand about making an article. I think it might fit into the Winnipeg market more since that's closer and it actually comes in there, but I'll just leave it in the GF market since it's technically in the GF market according to radio databases.--milk the cows (Talk) 04:12, 14 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Krwblogogold.jpg

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Image:Krwblogogold.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 23:25, 2 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Add topic