Talk:KTMW
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the KTMW article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Notability (Talk:Polygamy: What Love Is This?)
editPolygamy: What Love Is This? was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 16 August 201 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into KTMW. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
Text and/or other creative content from this version of Talk:Polygamy: What Love Is This? was copied or moved into Talk:KTMW with this edit on 08:02, 13 August 201. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
This article was proposed for deletion; I did remove the proposal and cleaned up most of the issues (principally the lack of third-party references) to the best of my ability, and re-applied some of the references more appropriately. I removed some of the "unreliable source" references and unverifiable text, and edited some of the text for clarity. The article does need considerably more fleshing out, however, in order to underpin its notability; nevertheless, I would propose that it remain undeleted because part of its notability is in its uniqueness; until the advent of the TLC program "Sister Wives," (which "What Love Is This" pre-dates) I am not aware of any other (non-fiction) program that deals primarily with the topic of polygamy from a critical perspective, and it remains unique in its critical perspective on polygamy. 174.23.68.63 (talk) 16:26, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
- Novelty does not imbue a subject with notability; instead "[t]he common theme in the notability guidelines is that there must be verifiable objective evidence that the subject has received significant attention to support a claim of notability. The evidence must show the topic has gained significant independent coverage or recognition..." (WP:NRVE) This seems nearly impossible to be meet on this subject.
- Also "[t]he barometer of notability is whether people independent of the topic itself (or of its manufacturer, creator, author, inventor, or vendor) have actually considered the topic notable enough that they have written and published non-trivial works of their own that focus upon it – without incentive, promotion, or other influence by people connected to the topic matter." This means material from Doris Hanson, KTMW, A Shield and Refuge Ministry, Main Street Church &/or its related organizations cannot be used to establish notability for this TV program.
- As notability is also not inheritable from those people & organizations, that leaves us with only one potentially wp:RS source so far: the 2011-03-09 Davis County Clipper article. However in the body of that article, the only text about the show TV show is the following trivial mention: She also hosts a weekly TV program on KMTV Channel 20, “Polygamy: What Love is This?”, while the entire rest of the article again focused on Hanson herself, almost exclusively thru a series of direct quotes, attributed to her.
- Other than the trivial one sentence mention in the Davis County Clipper, there is absolutely no mention of this show in reliable third party publications/sources that can be found in the first 149 hits from an advanced Google search ( http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Polygamy+What+Love+Is+This%22&hl=en&num=10&lr=&ft=i&cr=&safe=images&tbs= ); after 149 entries it said "In order to show you the most relevant results, we have omitted some entries very similar to the 149 already displayed. If you like, you can repeat the search with the omitted results included" so it is unlikely that the omitted items will have anything reliant.
- This article should be deleted on notability grounds. -- 208.81.184.4 (talk) 23:14, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
- It would probably be better to retitle and slightly rewrite the article so that is about A Shield and Refuge Ministry, which seems a bit more notable than the radio program. Steve Dufour (talk) 18:04, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
- It's a local TV program, not radio. -- 208.81.184.4 (talk) 21:23, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
- I will work on this next week if nobody objects. Steve Dufour (talk) 18:06, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
- It would probably be better to retitle and slightly rewrite the article so that is about A Shield and Refuge Ministry, which seems a bit more notable than the radio program. Steve Dufour (talk) 18:04, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on KTMW. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130829004251/http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1082A2.pdf to http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1082A2.pdf
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://broadcastengineering.com/automation/ktmw-goes-digital-nverzion-automation-0223/index.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:59, 30 April 2017 (UTC)