Talk:Kacey Wong
 | Kacey Wong has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: September 6, 2015. (Reviewed version). |
 | This article is written in Hong Kong English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, travelled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright problem removed
editPrior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://news.artnet.com/art-world/kacey-wongs-protest-art-goes-on-view-in-hong-kong-in-the-wake-of-the-umbrella-movement-273789. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:59, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- 'ew istranscluded from Talk:Kacey Wong/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk · contribs) 22:12, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
- Will start soon.--Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 22:12, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
- Some comments:
- Three Dead links.
- Citations in lead and Infobox are unecessary.
- Everything in the lead and the Infobox should be mention in the body
- Seven citations for one point is too many per WP:OVERCITE.
- More secondary sources, please.--Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 22:26, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
- Please note that I am on a break and editing on a mobile device is wanting. I will do further work on this when I return. Specific responses:
- I have removed one dead link, which happens to be redundant; the others need replacing rather than removal
- citations in the lead are not contraindicated, and are often preferred by reviewers for contentious assertions; i cannot do what you request from a mobile device
- As far as I can tell, the points in the lead are already in the body
- Excess citations have been culled
- AFAICT, the vast majority of citations are from secondary sources, and there are only about three from primary sources. Kindly clarify which sources you have an issue with.
- Passing, well done.--Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 20:03, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
- -- Ohc ¡digame! 11:05, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Kacey Wong. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20150320185212/http://www.theartnewspaper.com:80/articles/Artists-take-stock-of-the-Umbrella-Movement/37299 to http://www.theartnewspaper.com/articles/Artists-take-stock-of-the-Umbrella-Movement/37299
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:43, 26 February 2016 (UTC)