Talk:Kadan

Untitled

Regarding the confusion between Kadan and Kaidu, here is an excerpt from Chambers' book The Devil's Horsemen. "Nevertheless, several serious histories of central Europe still refer to Liegnitz as a Polish victory, and the most widespread misunderstanding, caused by the use of nicknames and the awesome difficulty encountered in translating oriental characters, has managed to survive into the majority of general history books today. Kadan was mistranslated as Kaidu, and it is therefore said that Ogedei's grandson Kaidu, and not his son Kadan, who partnered Baidar in Poland in 1241. Quite apart form the obscurity of the manuscripts this is impossible since it is known that Kaidu was born in 1230 and ten-year-old boys did not command Mongol armies" (pp. 100-101). Olessi 02:10, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

Chagatai's or Ogodei's??

This site [1] tells that one of the leaders of the first mongol attack against Poland, alongside with Baidar and Orda Khan, was a Chagatai's son named Qaidan. And that the Ogodei's son Kadan was one of the commanders of the mongol forces in Transylvania. I think that this sites solves the mistery about this.

Hi! Chagatai's son Baidar attented the campaign. He did not have a son called Kadan. Please read Rashid Ad-din or Gumilev.L.N.. I think that it was mistake. user: Enerelt —Preceding comment was added at 10:49, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

No - unless you are an historian with much experience with the history of the Mongol empire, using primary sources can get you into problems, as they often have false or mistaken information in them. They must be balanced with other writings and archaeological findings to arrive at the proper conclusions - which Chamber's The Devil's Horsemen does (it's THE best general source in any language for the Mongol expeditions into Europe, a watershed work.) HammerFilmFan (talk) 21:58, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kadan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100323064005/http://portal.klis.com.hr/povijest-klisa/ to http://portal.klis.com.hr/povijest-klisa/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:04, 3 January 2018 (UTC)