At the beggining, the damaged church could have been restored. But the occupation forces demolished nearly the half of the remaining structure, and left only the entrance and spire. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.230.80.111 (talk) 00:58, 10 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

IT IS TIME TO REBUILD THE CHURCH

The same way as in Dresden, the Kaiser Wilhelm Memorial Church should be rebuilt because the modern building is very UGLY.--81.34.137.29 (talk) 12:30, 11 September 2011 (UTC) It is possible to restore the original beltry tower while demolishing the ugly rectangular tower. The rest of the modern building could be left.--83.41.162.125 (talk) 13:24, 28 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kaiser Wilhelm Memorial Church. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:10, 5 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:23, 6 June 2020 (UTC)Reply