Talk:Kaleen, Australian Capital Territory
Latest comment: 6 months ago by JackofOz in topic Naming convention
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
 | It is requested that an image or photograph of Kaleen, Australian Capital Territory be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Naming convention
editWhat's going on? Is there a good reason why 'Kaleen' is named as simply 'Kaleen' when every other suburb / division name with the ACT is named as 'suburb, Australian Capital Territory'?
If there is some consensus that 'Australian Capital Territory' is not required, then why has this not been applied to all other ACT suburb names (other than those which need it - like Gordon, Kingston, Stirling, Parkes etc) ? MartinL-585 (talk) 23:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
- There is a consensus that disambiguation is generally not required for Australian suburbs and they should be handled according to Wikipedia:Disambiguation. Almost all Canberra suburbs were handled under a previous consensus applied to Australian geographical names which has long been abandoned. Suburbs in Australia are moved individually applying the principles of Wikipedia:Disambiguation but it has been agreed there will be no mass moves. Kaleen is an obvious appropriate case for the move since there are no other Kaleens.--Grahame (talk) 00:21, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
- I've just moved it. I agree with MartinL-585's thinking. -- Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 12:20, 22 May 2024 (UTC)