Talk:Kambarata-1 Dam
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Kambarata-1 Dam article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph of Kambarata-1 Dam be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in Kyrgyzstan may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Merge with Kambar-Ati-1 Hydro Power Plant
editThis article is for the dam of the Kambar-Ati-1 Hydro Power Plant. Essentially, they are both the same project and construction is expected to start this year. For consistency and common name, I think this article should be merged into the older Hydro Power Plant one. The Kambar-Ati (Kambaratinsk, Kambarata) projects (1 & 2) were a little difficult to research which makes this confusing. Some sources: 1, 2.--NortyNort (Holla) 14:58, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
- In my opinion... I think that there should just be links between the pages... e.g. what I'm going to do in my following edit.... for example, we don't have separate articles called "Hoover Dam Powerplant" or "Shasta Dam Powerplant". I think a dam (especially a 900 foot one) is a subject notable enough to merit its own article... Further opinions?
- Separate reservoir and dam articles are common but not separate dam and power plant articles. I could see a separate article if both were large and detailed in size. Considering that the dam is going to be quite large (and also blast filled I believe) maybe the power station article should be merged into here. I would suggest the article have the 2 in its name i.e. "Kambaratinsk 2 Dam", "Kambarata 2 Dam", etc. I will do some more research.--NortyNort (Holla) 03:07, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
- I did the merge. Note: a good source for specs on the Kambarata 1 and 2 is here.--NortyNort (Holla) 14:25, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
- Separate reservoir and dam articles are common but not separate dam and power plant articles. I could see a separate article if both were large and detailed in size. Considering that the dam is going to be quite large (and also blast filled I believe) maybe the power station article should be merged into here. I would suggest the article have the 2 in its name i.e. "Kambaratinsk 2 Dam", "Kambarata 2 Dam", etc. I will do some more research.--NortyNort (Holla) 03:07, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
Requested move
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the proposal was moved. --BDD (talk) 16:20, 3 April 2013 (UTC) (non-admin closure)
Kambaratinsk Dam → Kambarata-1 Dam – To be in line with Kambarata-2 and Kambarata-3 articles. Beagel (talk) 13:22, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- Support - per text about horizontal consistency on WP:AT In ictu oculi (talk) 15:47, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Kambarata-1 Dam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110714075623/http://resources.metapress.com/pdf-preview.axd?code=17704u1408338262&size=largest to http://resources.metapress.com/pdf-preview.axd?code=17704u1408338262&size=largest
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:50, 5 December 2017 (UTC)