Talk:Kampfgeschwader 76
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Kampfgeschwader 76 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Removal of maintenance template
editI restored the tag {{refimprove|date=October 2016}} as the issues has not been addressed. Please let me know if there are any concerns. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:46, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
- I restored the template, again. The article contains 11 paragraphs, 9 of which are uncited. The reverting editor states that ""article mostly covered. unnecessary" but I don't see how. K.e.coffman (talk) 18:52, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
Second removal of maintenance templates
editMaintenance templates should not be removed diff until the issue is addressed. Please see:
 | This article needs additional citations for verification. (October 2016) |
Recent edit
editI partially reverted recent edits diff. The reason to do this was to remove the uncited material that has previously been challenged.
The recent editing has made it difficult to separate content building edits from restoration of the uncited material and removal of maintenance tag. The first edit restored uncited material and removed the maintenance tags: diff. (By the way "reverted back to my last edit" is not a sufficient justification to a revert and brings to mind WP:OWN).
Subsequent edits (diff) provided some citations, but did not restore the tag and did not remove the uncited material either.
I've done my best to separate the two, and bring back a more acceptable version of the article, with the maintenance tags. Please also see above for two notices about the removal of the maint tag. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:24, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- You need to do better than that. Explain how that implies ownership. Dapi89 (talk) 19:26, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- How should I be interpreting the edit summary "reverted back to my last edit"? Please help me understand. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:17, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- As precisely that. Dapi89 (talk) 19:36, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
01.jpg){kind=link}
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:39, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
01.jpg){kind=link}