Talk:Kang Yong-suk

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Slatersteven in topic libel
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Kang Yong-suk. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:21, 26 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

NPOV Dispute and potential citation misuse

edit

It appears that a string of edits on the 25th of April, 2019 pushed a really extreme pov into the article ([1],[2],[3],[4],[5]). What's particularly concerning to me is the way the editor inserted, deleted, or directly contradicted information in cited sentences without changing the sources, leading me to suspect that the citations as they stand are being misused. Unfortunately, the sources are all in Korean, which I haven't studied. While I would undergo a major rewrite and delete parts of the article in accordance with BLP, my own knowledge of the subject is limited, and without knowing Korean I'm unable to go through the sources to evaluate them. For example, regardless of the obviously un-encyclopedic "known" in [6], my impression is that Ahn Cheol-soo isn't a liberal, and yet I'm not sure how I could check it, and without blanking much of the article, I am unsure what sort of rewrite would be appropriate or where to find sources. For now I'll place a NPOV tag on the article. Thanks, Darthkayak (talk) 11:28, 29 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Relying in translation software many of those sources do not seem to contain key weasel words or phrases such as "debating prowess" "False" the general tone is way to positive for what this source [[7]] calls disgraced.Slatersteven (talk) 12:20, 25 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Experiance

edit

What kind, is this education, work experience, did he once visit on a school day trip? This lacks any detail or context, thus reads like puffery.Slatersteven (talk) 12:14, 25 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

edit

Not sure if this is usable [[8]].Slatersteven (talk) 12:30, 25 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Harvard degree

edit

The source seems to say he did not get a degree at Harvard, he was a visiting lecturer.Slatersteven (talk) 12:45, 25 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

libel

edit

No idea if this would be RS [[9]], can someone find a better source?Slatersteven (talk) 14:05, 25 October 2019 (UTC)Reply