Talk:Kangding County
Latest comment: 14 years ago by John Hill in topic Proposed merger with Kangding
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Kangding County redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
I totally agree with the proposed merger - I look forward to seeing the combined article when completed. Thank you for suggesting it. Sincerely, John Hill (talk) 10:06, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
- I dont think it is a relevant proposal, as the county and the city are 2 different subjects. I propose not merging. Status Quo. --Rédacteur Tibet (talk) 14:56, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose. I also recommend to keep them separate: since the city has 100,000 people, there will be more information to fill the separate city article. In the USA, a city of even 10,000 typically has enough points of interest to fill a short article. -Wikid77 (talk) 22:08, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
Strong oppose The county and town are quite seperate. It would be like merging the New York City article into the New York State article. Dr. Blofeld White cat 11:24, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
- Sometimes one has to eat humble pie. Dr. Blofeld recently asked why I was in favour of the proposed merger and, on further reflection, I have reversed my opinion above that the articles should be merged and now am Strongly opposed. John Hill (talk) 22:42, 10 December 2009 (UTC)