Talk:Kanthaugen Freestyle Arena/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Grondemar (talk · contribs) 19:31, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

 Working Will post the review shortly. –Grondemar 19:31, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

This article is very close to meeting the Good Article criteria; I have only a couple of minor concerns:

• What is Kanthaugen? Is it a village, a mountain, or something else. It's a little unclear from the text.
• "At the time of the closing, it was suggested reopened as part of a controversial proposal to build a tobogganing slide from Kanthaugen to Stampesletta." Passive voice: who is suggesting that the ski lift be reopened?

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   This review is being placed on hold for a minimum of seven days to allow the above concerns to be addressed.

Thanks. –Grondemar 20:06, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the review. I've amended the two sentences per your concerns. Arsenikk ^(talk) 12:54, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

Looks good, thanks for addressing my concerns. I shall now pass this good article nomination. Congratulations! –Grondemar 01:06, 23 December 2011 (UTC)