Talk:Karl Philipp, Prince of Schwarzenberg

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Poliorketes in topic Critics

Untitled

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Move. —Wknight94 (talk) 17:40, 21 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Requested move

edit

Karl Philipp Fürst zu SchwarzenbergKarl Philipp, Prince of Schwarzenberg – I tried undoing a bad move to Karl Philipp, Prince Schwarzenberg but had to stop because of a redirect. Schwarzenberg was an actual territory, so it needs to be preceded by "of". Charles 23:50, 13 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Survey

edit

Discussion

edit

Add any additional comments

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Critics

edit

Wishing to preserve his army is a poor excuse for Schwarzenbergs blunders both at Dresden and Leipzig, both of which could have cost him his complete army. At Dresden he was saved by the lucky events at Kulm/Nollendorf, at Leipzig the Tsar had to overrule Schwarzenberg to avert complete disaster in the south. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Poliorketes (talkcontribs) 18:53, 20 June 2016 (UTC)Reply