Talk:Karma (Anxhela Peristeri song)/GA1
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Kyle Peake in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 07:22, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|
This is a large GAN from you; I will get on with it today! --K. Peake 07:22, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Infobox and lead
editWP:OVERLINK of Anxhela Peristeri in the Eurovision Song Contest part of the infoboxThe semi-final points are not sourced anywhere in the bodyThe composed and written/production sentence should be the second of the lead insteadRemove the mid-tempo part because that is not notable for the leadRemove the field of 26 part from the lead since it is not notable here"gave positive reviews of" → "gave widely positive reviews of""its nature, Peristeri's vocal delivery, and" → "the nature, Peristeri's vocal delivery and"Wikilink Eurovision Song ContestWikilink Kosovo
Background and composition
edit"Upon winning the" → "Upon her winning the""have previously been involved" → "had previously been involved"Mention in the composition the instrumentation like strings that the re-vamp added per sourcingThe lyrics need to be ended with a full-stop
Reception
edit"received widespread acclaim from" → "was met with widespread acclaim from""Aussievision characterised the song" → "The staff of Aussievision characterised the song""also gave a positive review of the song," → "also positively reviewed the song,""stage presence, and the song's lyrics." → "stage presence and the lyrics.""and more in-your-face"." → "and more in-your-face."" per MOS:QUOTE on full sentences"and "stronger contender" for a" → "and a "stronger contender" for a"
Promotion and music video
editRemove the comma after Ora NewsRemove pipe on Wiwi Jam[28][29][30] shouldn't these be ordered in the same order as the performances?The preview source seems to be for one of the revamped version rather than the music video; if so, shouldn't this be in background instead?
At Eurovision Song Contest
editBefore Rotterdam
editRemove pipe on 59th editionRemove wikilink on Festivali i KëngësRemove wikilink on Eurovision Song Contest 2021Pipe COVID-19 to COVID-19 pandemic
In Rotterdam
edit"on 18 and 20 May 2021, respectively, and" → "on 18 and 20 May and""was drawn to perform" → "was set to perform""was the first nation of the 10 to be" → "was one of the 10 nations to be""at 2nd position," → "at second position," per MOS:NUM- The second semi-final points should be mentioned here, as they are listed in the infobox and lead
- Added that part, you're fine with that? Iaof2017 (talk) 10:25, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
The glittery and crystal parts are not sourcedThe black LED backdrop is not sourcedWhere is the hand movements for light sourced?The grey colour is not sourced"with generally positive reviews from critics and viewers." → "with generally positive reviews from critics." per no viewer info being mentioned"concluded that it" → "concluded that the performance"
Credits and personnel
editWikilink Dimitris Kontopoulos
Track listing
edit- Good
Release history
edit- Good
References
edit- Copyvio score looks great at 24.2%!!!
The second citations of ref 8 are in a different language, so change the titles and add the language parameterCite Eurovision Union as publisher instead on ref 16Fix MOS:CAPS issues with ref 21Pipe Radio Televizioni Shqiptar to RTSH on ref 34Willaim Lee → William Lee on ref 55WP:OVERLINK of Telgrafi on ref 56
Final comments and verdict
edit- On hold until all of the issues are fixed! --K. Peake 10:24, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
- Heyyyy, I will continue with the rest tomorrow. Thank you for this review. Iaof2017 (talk) 20:29, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
- Iaof2017 Thank you for starting on this, I look forward to seeing the rest of your response later on or tomorrow if I'm working when you go over the remainder! --K. Peake 08:41, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- Kyle Peake thank you again, I responded to the remaining comments above. Iaof2017 (talk) 11:29, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- ✓ Pass now, fabulous work on this! --K. Peake 10:38, 13 June 2022 (UTC)