Talk:Karma (Anxhela Peristeri song)/GA1

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Kyle Peake in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 07:22, 11 June 2022 (UTC)Reply


Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose ( ) 1b. MoS ( ) 2a. ref layout ( ) 2b. cites WP:RS ( ) 2c. no WP:OR ( ) 2d. no WP:CV ( )
3a. broadness ( ) 3b. focus ( ) 4. neutral ( ) 5. stable ( ) 6a. free or tagged images ( ) 6b. pics relevant ( )
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked   are unassessed

This is a large GAN from you; I will get on with it today! --K. Peake 07:22, 11 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Infobox and lead

edit
  • WP:OVERLINK of Anxhela Peristeri in the Eurovision Song Contest part of the infobox
  • The semi-final points are not sourced anywhere in the body
  • The composed and written/production sentence should be the second of the lead instead
  • Remove the mid-tempo part because that is not notable for the lead
  • Remove the field of 26 part from the lead since it is not notable here
  • "gave positive reviews of" → "gave widely positive reviews of"
  • "its nature, Peristeri's vocal delivery, and" → "the nature, Peristeri's vocal delivery and"
  • Wikilink Eurovision Song Contest
  • Wikilink Kosovo

Background and composition

edit
  • "Upon winning the" → "Upon her winning the"
  • "have previously been involved" → "had previously been involved"
  • Mention in the composition the instrumentation like strings that the re-vamp added per sourcing
  • The lyrics need to be ended with a full-stop

Reception

edit
  • "received widespread acclaim from" → "was met with widespread acclaim from"
  • "Aussievision characterised the song" → "The staff of Aussievision characterised the song"
  • "also gave a positive review of the song," → "also positively reviewed the song,"
  • "stage presence, and the song's lyrics." → "stage presence and the lyrics."
  • "and more in-your-face"." → "and more in-your-face."" per MOS:QUOTE on full sentences
  • "and "stronger contender" for a" → "and a "stronger contender" for a"

Promotion and music video

edit
  • Remove the comma after Ora News
  • Remove pipe on Wiwi Jam
  • [28][29][30] shouldn't these be ordered in the same order as the performances?
  • The preview source seems to be for one of the revamped version rather than the music video; if so, shouldn't this be in background instead?

At Eurovision Song Contest

edit

Before Rotterdam

edit
  • Remove pipe on 59th edition
  • Remove wikilink on Festivali i Këngës
  • Remove wikilink on Eurovision Song Contest 2021
  • Pipe COVID-19 to COVID-19 pandemic

In Rotterdam

edit
  • "on 18 and 20 May 2021, respectively, and" → "on 18 and 20 May and"
  • "was drawn to perform" → "was set to perform"
  • "was the first nation of the 10 to be" → "was one of the 10 nations to be"
  • "at 2nd position," → "at second position," per MOS:NUM
  • The second semi-final points should be mentioned here, as they are listed in the infobox and lead
Added that part, you're fine with that? Iaof2017 (talk) 10:25, 12 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • The glittery and crystal parts are not sourced
  • The black LED backdrop is not sourced
  • Where is the hand movements for light sourced?
  • The grey colour is not sourced
  • "with generally positive reviews from critics and viewers." → "with generally positive reviews from critics." per no viewer info being mentioned
  • "concluded that it" → "concluded that the performance"

Credits and personnel

edit

Track listing

edit
  • Good

Release history

edit
  • Good

References

edit
  • Copyvio score looks great at 24.2%!!!
  • The second citations of ref 8 are in a different language, so change the titles and add the language parameter
  • Cite Eurovision Union as publisher instead on ref 16
  • Fix MOS:CAPS issues with ref 21
  • Pipe Radio Televizioni Shqiptar to RTSH on ref 34
  • Willaim Lee → William Lee on ref 55
  • WP:OVERLINK of Telgrafi on ref 56

Final comments and verdict

edit
Heyyyy, I will continue with the rest tomorrow. Thank you for this review. Iaof2017 (talk) 20:29, 11 June 2022 (UTC)Reply