Talk:Kató Lomb
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editI wonder if Ms Lomb is indeed a linguist. She is a polyglot, but this doesn't make her a linguist. There is no indication in the article that she ever studied language or languages in a scholarly way.--Tamas 18:56, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
It's the ambiguity of English which perhaps could be eliminated. In her Hungarian books, she definitely names herself a "lingvista" (someone whose hobby is languages, cf. philatelist etc) rather than a "nyelvész" (a linguist as a scholar). In English, there doesn't seem to be a more exact term for the former concept so it's a bit misleading indeed. However, if you can find a good term, feel free to insert it! Adam78 21:43, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
- That's the trouble, I can't. Linguist in English can indeed mean "lingvista" as well. Maybe we should just leave it as it is for the time being.--Tamas 12:40, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
Linguist
editThe problem is the English word, due to its original meaning which is indeed "a person who can speak foreign languages" or a professional working with languages. Notice for example how FBI and CIA are always complaining about lack of linguists (see for example here: http://www.meforum.org/article/754). You can be sure they don't mean people who can perform syntactic analysis, but rather people who have really mastered the critical foreign languages.
Method
editI wonder what method she used for Mandarin Chinese and Japanese. You can not obviously just buy a book and start reading without knowing the script first.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.119.123.147 (talk • contribs) 12:09, 3 April 2006
See here, on page 32. Adam78 (talk) 23:22, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Chinese translation of her book
editNote for "(Translations in other languages also might exist)":
- Yes. The Chinese version of the book is also there. I used to have one. I lost it somewhere. What a pity!
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.249.72.29 (talk • contribs) 07:15, 6 August 2008
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Kató Lomb. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5GpXRROM4?url=http://www.english-learning.co.uk/lomb.alkire.html to http://www.english-learning.co.uk/lomb.alkire.html
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.english-learning.co.uk/lomb.alkire.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:25, 3 May 2017 (UTC)