Talk:Kate Bolduan
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Chesapeake77 in topic Portrait image quality
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Kate Bolduan article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 90 days |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Portrait image quality
editThe image quality of her portrait is horrible. What needs to be done to use a better public image, such as her profile picture on Twitter:
https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1349455695473758214/Uz08vDZT_400x400.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scatophaga (talk • contribs) 00:59, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
- I just came over here for the same reason and saw this. Yes, the image quality for her infobox portrait shot is really poor.
- I just checked Wikimedia Commons and that poor quality image is the only thing over there for her.
- Can someone help?