Talk:Kate Gordon (energy analyst)

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Barnardandy1 in topic Rather Terse

Sorting information

edit

There is some great information here! May I suggest that you begin sorting it with headers, expand upon and add to them and write a concise lead? From what is here it does make me want to learn more about Kate Gordan! Deltagolf34 (talk) 03:41, 20 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Feedback

edit

I agree with Deltagolf34, there is already a lot of great information starting to come together in this article. I also agree that it is a matter of concise organization and further research to fill in missing gaps. There is a good amount of info dealing with Gordon's professional life. Based on the information so far, it seems like there is an oppurtunity to structure the article around both Gordon's career and actions in the political arena. The challenging aspect is finding more biographical information, which is difficult with some of the more recent figures. As far as the tone, the article reads encyclopedic and non-partisan. Also, I don't notice any grammar errors. Overall, I think there is a good amount of interesting information here and I will be interested to read more about Gordon and her career. Good luck! --TylerDC25 (talk) 21:52, 20 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Rather Terse

edit

It seems that some of the information in this article could be expanded upon. For example, in the reference to her interview on the Rachel Maddow show, it would be great if more information was given on the nature of the interview and what was exchanged. Also, the mention of the bill brought before Congress in 2009 could give more information on the bill itself or even a hyperlink to an article on the bill. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Barnardandy1 (talkcontribs) 15:16, 23 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Rather Terse

edit

It seems that some of the information in this article could be expanded upon. For example, in the reference to her interview on the Rachel Maddow show, it would be great if more information was given on the nature of the interview and what was exchanged. Also, the mention of the bill brought before Congress in 2009 could give more information on the bill itself or even a hyperlink to an article on the bill. Barnardandy1 (talk) 15:22, 23 November 2016 (UTC) Andy BarnardReply