This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Latest comment: 2 months ago3 comments2 people in discussion
I've added more references to this draft. Katherine Heiny has had articles written about her by The Guardian, The Washington Post, The New York Times and the Independent, as well as numerous reviews. Please let me know if there's anything more I can do. Blackballnz (talk) 05:45, 8 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for your work on this article! What convinced me to accept it through AfC was being able to find, though my own research, that several of her books had 2+ reviews. Multiple WP:NBOOK-notable books support a WP:NAUTHOR-notable bio, and notability is typically what AfC is looking for; if you're writing similar articles in future, you can speed up the AfC process by putting multiple high-quality book reviews in the article.
To continue improving this article, I think it would be great if each of the books had a little paragraph giving more of a detailed plot summary (especially describing the ending, if you can find it out!). It is also usually better to summarize book reviews rather than quote them, and to focus on descriptions rather than praise. For example, in this NYT review of Standard Deviation I notice that they say the book is "Told in the third person but heavily mediated by Graham’s consciousness" so the article could note that is is third person subjective or uses free indirect discourse. There's also some good stuff in this review about the structure and tone of the novel. I suggest those edits because you asked, and because it's always possible for an article to get even better! Thanks again for your contributions here. ~ L 🌸 (talk) 01:36, 9 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
.jpg){kind=small}
