This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Opera, a group writing and editing Wikipedia articles on operas, opera terminology, opera composers and librettists, singers, designers, directors and managers, companies and houses, publications and recordings. The project discussion page is a place to talk about issues and exchange ideas. New members are welcome!OperaWikipedia:WikiProject OperaTemplate:WikiProject OperaOpera articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
This article was created or improved during the #1day1woman initiative hosted by the Women in Red project in 2024. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles
Latest comment: 15 hours ago4 comments2 people in discussion
@Adolphus79The current article uses high quality sources, and all of the content is found in those references. There is not a WP:VERIFIABILITY issue here; particularly since the main source being used is a highly respected encyclopedia that is accessible for free through the Wikipedia Library, and the other two are respected journal articles providing independent reviews. Wikipedia:Offline sources and subscription access sources are treated with the same respect that we give sources that you can view. In this case all of the sources are from major academic publishers that are considered reliable.4meter4 (talk) 00:29, 21 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
All of the biological information was sourced with a single source, which is why I originally tagged it with the onesource template ("This article relies largely or entirely on a single source."). You decided to remove that tag without any improvements to the sourcing. You have since added another primary source for a very small part of the content. Honestly, I am not going to bother with it any further, if you are willing to argue about the requested improvements instead of just adding additional sources to this BLP. I was only concerned that future readers might question WP:GNG, but I'm not going to make any further suggestions since you have had such a problem with my previous attempts. As for the source in question being available for free on the Wikipedia Library, maybe you should link to that instead of a website that you need an account to access and a sign-up page that is not currently working. Remember, the information needs to be verifiable by the average reader at any given time, not just those with advanced knowledge of how and where to find the information to be able to verify it. - Adolphus79 (talk) 01:02, 21 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Adolphus79 The article has two book reviews in respected musicology journals and an entry in an encyclopedia. Those are three high quality sources which is enough to satisfy WP:SIGCOV and WP:NAUTHOR per WP:THREE. Honestly the fact that she is already in a published encyclopedia means she meets WP:5P1. Topics covered in another encyclopedia automatically pass WP:N. There's absolutely no way that there is a notability issue here.4meter4 (talk) 01:08, 21 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Like I already said, do whatever... I apologize for trying to improve the article, I know better than to question anyone else's actions around here. Good luck. - Adolphus79 (talk) 01:13, 21 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
