Talk:Katherine Reutter/GA1
GA Review
editArticle (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Nosleep (Talk · Contribs) 21:44, 1 August 2010 (UTC) –Grondemar 04:38, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
I'm going to withdraw as reviewer. I don't think I can fairly assess whether such a short article meets the GA criteria. I would never list it, but that doesn't mean that's the right decision. Nosleep (Talk · Contribs) 05:14, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
Working I'll pick this up. I'll attempt to complete the review in the next few days. –Grondemar 04:38, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
I've reviewed the article, and have the following concerns I'd like to see addressed before I pass it as a good article:
- A couple of the references are deadlinks. Could you either repair them or find a new source? I'd also accept a reference to the original newspaper if you can determine the section and page.
- It may be a good idea, to prevent future deadlinks, to archive the web-accessible references. I recommend WebCite. Note this isn't required to pass, however.
- It would be nice to have a photo of her for the article. I noticed that she had an email address on the linked website; could you try contacting her and seeing if she would be willing to freely license a photo we could use?
Note I'm not particularly concerned with the length of the article; it's short but appears to cover all needed information, and is comparable to other Good Articles on Olympic athletes such as Carmelo Camet.
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- This article will be on hold for a minimum of seven days to allow the above concerns to be addressed.
- Pass/Fail:
Thank you. –Grondemar 23:10, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
- Hello and thank you for your review. I've replaced the dead links. The references I added to her personal life section covers 2005-2007 well so I think those are good enough. I also added a website that lists all her sponsors. Thanks for pointing out that tool, I will definitely used that for my future edits. I just sent an e-mail to Katherine Reutter so I'm hoping to get a response from her soon. I already checked Flickr and nothing was available. I think I've addressed all your concerns. If I missed something, please tell me. Thank you.Philipmj24 (talk) 01:34, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
- One thing I noticed with the way you added the new references: when using WebCite with {{cite news}}, you want to keep the original URL in the "url=" field, and place the WebCite URL in the "archiveurl=" field. You also want to add the "archivedate=" property, which is when you uploaded the webpage in the WebCite archive. For examples of how this would look like filled out, you can look at 2009 International Bowl, an article I recently got passed as a Featured Article. You can see all the references by clicking the Edit button on the References section, since I used list-defined references.
- With the assumption that this last minor thing will be corrected, I'm going to go ahead and pass this article as a Good Article. Congratulations! –Grondemar 02:43, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks man! Just corrected that minor thing (if I missed something please tell me). Again, thanks for that website reference, it's going to change the way I edit Wikipedia from now on!Philipmj24 (talk) 02:12, 13 August 2010 (UTC)