Talk:Kathimerini

Untitled

there are no left-leaning journalist in this newspaper.

Patent nonsense, but you get to have your say. Please sign your comments next time around. --Thorsen 10:31, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

edits by 87.101.51.84

Hello. I completely disagree with the direction your recent edits are taking the article. It is as if the article as it is is trying to "prove" a leftist orientation of Kathimerini, instead of being an encyclopedic article about it and that is in discord with the NPOV policy. For one thing, I do not agree that K has moved to the left. It is as right-wing as ever. For another, K is a big national newspaper that hosts a great diversity of columnists, op-editors and reporters. It is easy to find a few of them that can be labeled as left wingers, and it is just as easy (if not easier) to find hard-line right wingers too. The cases of Delastik and Papakonstantinou are (imho) notable enough as they are both high profile both at the paper and at their party. However they are not the ones that either own the paper or make its alignment decisions. They are not a sign that K has become left-wing, rather that it is large enough to be able to accommodate some left wingers. Anyhow, citing a December 2006 article to demonstrate a leftist shift is an example of recentism, something to be avoided in general, not to mention that the contents of a Russian report are irrelevant to the article about the paper that published an article about the report. --Michalis Famelis (talk) 15:53, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Leftist? Kathimerini has never been left, it is center right. Which is a good thing, the KKE cannot get their filthy commie propaganda out through Kathimerini.--NeroDrusus 22:04, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Delastik??? Wasn't he a columnist of eleytherotypia? I don't know if he is really a leftist, but I know he is Jewish and he spreading lies about the Greek Nationalist movement. Mitsos 17:00, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

This is not an article

Everything from the sentence ending with ...Cyprus. to the bottom should be deleted.

This text is a quick description of the newspaper, following a whole page of ramblings by some angry right-wing reader. The couple of citations added are simply references to the articles; they do not justify the personal opinions presented here. The reality is that Kathimerini decided to purge all right-wing populist remarks and become a well-respected conservative newspaper. But even adding that would be too much; it would require quite some research or an independent source to support that. I'd like to ask anyone interested in this article to focus first on adding some useful information (historic info for example) first and leave the political debate aside for a while.

I'll leave this tag on for a few days in case anyone comes up with real evidence of a communist plot to take over the greek nation's #1 conservative newspaper... --Treiskaitetarto 04:49, 27 February 2007 (UTC) PS: The fact that one of its writers is Jewish doesn't count by the way

All I read in the previous version was the remark that Kathimerini had shifted to the left of the political spectrum (the latter being quite different from "purging populism", except in the minds of fevered left-wingers).. In my opinion, it is a tenable position. Having said that, I agree with you that such a comment should be supported by third-party observations, rather than "examples" from the paper itself, per WP:NOR. Even so, it hardly makes it an "angry right-winger rant" or a suggestion that "there is a communist plot to take over Kathimerini". You don't need to use strawman arguments to support otherwise justified edits. 87.243.69.164 13:09, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Actually it'd be nice to have a source even for the claim "it is traditionally perceived as a conservative media flagship"... is there a good source of any sort on its political leanings we can cite? --Delirium 13:07, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

well worldpress.org uses the label (conservative) next to kathimerini in this article:

http://www.worldpress.org/Mideast/1103.cfm

I think it should be considered reliable enough --Treiskaitetarto 13:22, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Liberal/Conservative

The source labels it as a conservative newspaper[1].--— ZjarriRrethues — ^talk 14:45, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Kathimerini. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20140116120046/http://portal.kathimerini.gr/4dcgi/_w_articles_kathbreak_1_02/11/2008_254414 to http://portal.kathimerini.gr/4dcgi/_w_articles_kathbreak_1_02/11/2008_254414

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:59, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Logo-kathimerini-gr.svg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:37, 10 March 2022 (UTC)