Talk:Katie Armiger
This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editThis is definitely a worthy article of Wikipedia. She is a big buzz where I live locally, in Houston, and is getting lots of play time on the radio all over the country. Please stop deleting this page, she is an important singer who will more than likely soon hit it big.
I feel it's a little different than the average "up-and-comer" because of her full record-company support, critical acclaim, etc. Please let me know what I can do to save the article - or is it simply a matter of the subject?
- Provide verifiable references to reliable sources to demonstrate that she meets the notability guidelines for musicians. Also note that you are free to make your case on the AfD discussion page.
- Forgive us more experienced editors if we're a little jaded about seeing terms like "aspiring" and "up and coming" in articles--words like that scream "not notable yet", which in turn means "not notable". --Finngall talk 21:19, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Katie Armiger. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070811172925/http://www.omgnashville.com/comments.htm to http://www.omgnashville.com/comments.htm
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.wqdr.net/misc14284.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:08, 7 December 2017 (UTC)