Talk:Kauai Plantation Railway/GA1

Latest comment: 1 year ago by ZKang123 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: ZKang123 (talk · contribs) 01:44, 15 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):  
    b (citations to reliable sources):  
    c (OR):  
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):  
    b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  

Overall:
Pass/Fail:  

  ·   ·   ·  

This is a relatively short article. As such, I don't have many issues with this article. Just a couple of things:

That's all for now.--ZKang123 (talk) 01:44, 15 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the review, @ZKang123: I think I've responded to everything know. Let me know if you have any further comments. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 17:47, 15 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
No other outstanding problems I can find for this article. Issues raised are satisfactorily explained or addressed.--ZKang123 (talk) 00:18, 16 November 2022 (UTC)Reply