- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Desertarun (talk) 15:34, 12 June 2021 (UTC)Reply
The Kawasaki Route near its eastern terminus
- ... that a two kilometer-long section of the Kawasaki Route (pictured) cost 2.9 trillion yen to complete? Source: "今回開通する区間の総工費約2900億円のうち、市の負担分は約170億円を見込んでいる" [1]
- ALT1:... that the Kawasaki Route (pictured) is planned to become a part of a ring road around the Greater Tokyo Area? Source: "これまでの検討及び意見聴取結果も踏まえ、計画の基本的な方針の取りまとめに必要となる検討を進めることを確認した。また、川崎縦貫道路の計画と一本化する場合について、整備効果や起終点、連結位置、費用負担の考え方などを、さらに検討することを確認した。" [2]
5x expanded by Mccunicano (talk). Self-nominated at 02:58, 1 June 2021 (UTC).Reply
| General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
|
|
| Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
|
|
|
Overall: 
The readable prose was expanded fivefold and the nomination submitted within seven days. Length and sourcing are adequate. Article is neutral in tone and no plagiarism was detected. Images used in the article are properly licensed on the Commons. The photo in this nomination is used within the article and clear at a low resolution. The QPQ requirement has been completed. The hooks are reasonably interesting and both are properly cited in the article with a verified source. Flibirigit (talk) 19:38, 11 June 2021 (UTC)Reply
.svg)
Reviewing... Flibirigit (talk) 19:26, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
The readable prose was expanded fivefold and the nomination submitted within seven days. Length and sourcing are adequate. Article is neutral in tone and no plagiarism was detected. Images used in the article are properly licensed on the Commons. The photo in this nomination is used within the article and clear at a low resolution. The QPQ requirement has been completed. The hooks are reasonably interesting and both are properly cited in the article with a verified source. Flibirigit (talk) 19:38, 11 June 2021 (UTC)