Talk:Kayden Kross
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
.svg){kind=small}
 | This article has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
DWTS?
editAnybody know about her maybe appearing on dancing with the stars this year?--Cooly123 23:10, 8 July 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cooly123 (talk • contribs)
Her blog seems to have vanished...??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.183.128.169 (talk) 12:38, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
Birth Date anomaly?
editText says (Redacted) but the data box has no Birth Date.
Is this on purpose? And if so, what might be the explanation? And if there is one, sholdn't it be visible on the page?? Gwrede (talk) 20:28, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
- Probably because of this:
- https://jezebel.com/wikipedia-exposes-porn-performers-to-stalking-harassme-1839229067
- Zezen (talk) 13:32, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
- See WP:DOB for the explanation and Wikipedia:No disclaimers for the question of making it visible. --Sangdeboeuf (talk) 22:34, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
Legal name
editAccording to our Biographies of living persons policy, it's preferable to omit a subject's full legal name when it "has not been widely disseminated or has been intentionally concealed, such as in certain court cases or occupations". Kross has definitely objected to her legal name appearing on Wikipedia,[1] and sex workers in general seem like exactly the people whom the policy is intended to protect. The Daily News source that was cited does not mention Kross' legal name; on balance it seems to be a trivial bit of information that doesn't help the average reader understand the topic. While Wikipedia is not censored, that isn't a reason to expose subjects to real-world harassment, as Kross claims to have experienced as a result of her name being publicized here.[1] —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 01:15, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
References
- ^ a b Clark-Flory, Tracy (24 October 2019). "Wikipedia Exposes Porn Performers to Stalking, Harassment—And Visits From CPS". Jezebel.