Talk:Keith McCready/GA1

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Sammi Brie in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sammi Brie (talk · contribs) 23:12, 15 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):  
    b (citations to reliable sources):  
    c (OR):  
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):  
    b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  

Overall:
Pass/Fail:  

  ·   ·   ·  


Give this a fresh set of eyes. It needs it. 7-day hold to Lee Vilenski. Sammi Brie (she/her • tc) 04:59, 16 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Copy changes

edit
  • For an American biography, convert to mdy dates.
I've made the change via a template. Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 11:29, 16 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • I found a ref with a useful quote: [1]

Lead

edit
  • From 2003 to 2006, McCready was a contributing writer to InsidePOOL Magazine, and is known for comedically interacting with the audience during matches. This is a weird juxtaposition. These two items don't seem to relate. Also, no comma here.

Personal life

edit

Professional career

edit

Sourcing and spot checks

edit

I selected five references for spot checks: 2, 5, 11, 16, 23.

  • 2 (NYT book review): Provides the gaming with dad anecdote.
  • 5: This site is dead (mark appropriately). This does not look verifiable since the archived site didn't save the video. Several refs will need url-status set.
  • 11: Uses the Earthquake nickname.
  • 16: AGF on the offline source.
  • 23: Checks out, However, it is [sic] was his high stakes gambling that earned him the lion’s share of his reputation as one of the most feared 9-ball players.. I assume Capelle is a subject matter expert.

Other items

edit

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Sammi Brie (talkcontribs) 04:59, 16 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Third-party follow-up comments

edit

I did a minor-editing pass on it (fixed a chronological-order problem, a grammar error, some punctuation pecadilloes, etc.). I think it looks pretty good (maybe biased opinion, as I worked on this article years ago when it was in a rough state :-). In answer to a question above, yes Capelle is a subject-matter expert; probably the best-selling pool instructional author after Robert Byrne (author). To answer the question about the blog source [28]: R.A. Dyer is also a subject-matter expert with multiple relevant non-self-published books under his belt [1]; but regardless, the material is based on the book Pool Wars by Jay Helfert, which someone could buy and read and cite instead. But Dyer is actually good enough.  — SMcCandlish ¢ 😼  09:51, 16 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Should be fixed now. Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 22:12, 16 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
  1. ^ Bernstein, Viv (September 3, 1985). "9-ball champ is unyielding". Press and Sun-Bulletin. Binghamton, New York. p. 7-B. Retrieved October 16, 2022 – via Newspapers.com.