Talk:Keith Warwick

Birth date

Despite my own note I'm going to suggest re-adding 16 May 1967 as the DOB as both IMDB and User:Kevinwarick agree on this. Rich Farmbrough, 09:59, 29 December 2009 (UTC).

I'm not committed either way, but we generally would not accept either as sufficiently reliable sources in a BLP.  Skomorokh  10:38, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

Due to repeated edit warring to change the subject's date of birth, I have semiprotected the article with the status quo ante birthdate presented. If anyone can provide a reference for the 1967 date of birth, then please do so here. --Kinu ^t/_c 19:24, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Keith was the year above me at Hillhead High school and I’ve just turned 54. I used to know Keith in Glasgow and he’s definitely at least one year older. I went to Langside college with his younger sister Rhona and my friend dated him in high school. 82.23.26.223 (talk) 16:14, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

Proposing deletion

I have proposed this article for deletion. At the moment, this article is an unsourced WP:BLP and thus much of the content ultimately violates WP:V. It is also one hot WP:COI mess. --Kinu ^t/_c 15:57, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

To be fair to the author(s), it's only an unsourced BLP because you removed the sources. Skomorokh 16:17, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

Those are quotes without any actual attribution. Where, specifically, are said quotes published? As written, they were simply puffery, not critical commentary with legitimate sourcing. The information also does nothing to satisfy the BLP issue. --Kinu ^t/_c 16:18, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

They are indications of reliably sourced coverage, which is the cloth from which verifiability and notability are made. Assuming good faith, the quotes are legitimately taken from the sources indicated; do you not agree that asking the author for fuller citations would be a more productive and less biting course of action than removing them outright for unrelated (albeit justifiable) reasons? Are we really improving our reader's experience of the encyclopaedia like this? Skomorokh 16:45, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

Hi, I was wondering if these references have to be confirmed? On the 28th of Oct I added referencess (below) and context.

http://www.heraldscotland.com/variety-is-the-spice-of-life-for-warwick-1.838469

http://www.heraldscotland.com/sport/spl/aberdeen/theatre-the-gun-citizens-theatre-glasgow-1.403934

http://www.heraldscotland.com/sport/spl/aberdeen/damaged-goods-tron-theatre-glasgow-1.185595

http://www.heraldscotland.com/sport/spl/aberdeen/pantomime-cinderella-ayr-gaiety-1.206106

http://www.heraldscotland.com/sport/spl/aberdeen/punk-rock-shock-horror-1.785633 - Keithwarwick (talk) 12:58, 28 October 2010

Thanks, --Keithwarwick (talk) 09:01, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Keith Warwick. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.highland-news.co.uk/news/fullstory.php/aid/4812/There_s_nothing_wishy_washy_about_Keith.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110628231737/http://www.tv.com/the-bill/dont-kill-the-messenger/episode/86812/cast.html?tag=episode_header%3Bcast to http://www.tv.com/the-bill/dont-kill-the-messenger/episode/86812/cast.html?tag=episode_header%3Bcast

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:13, 3 May 2017 (UTC)