Talk:Kek Lok Si/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Muffin Wizard (talk · contribs) 11:18, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

I will do a review on this article as soon as possible, but please be patient. :)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Good.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   All references used are reliable sources, seems fine.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Good.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   Seems neutral.

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   Seems fine, I see no edit war.

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   I see all images are available freely to use.

7. Overall: After a frequent more check to the article, I see there is no more problem, so I give it a passed, thanks for all your time to work on this article. :)

   Pass/Fail: