This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of South Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject South AfricaTemplate:WikiProject South AfricaSouth Africa articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
She has an MBE (for interior design) and has received quite a bit of press coverage so is she notable? I'd say yes. I suspect what you're driving at is that you don't believe that she's worthy of being notable, which is a different and somewhat more personal conclusion. Wikipedia has entries on all kinds of people, some of whom are famous for being famous (Paris Hilton is probably a good example). We don't have entries on other people who some may judge more worthwhile of attention. We don't, for example, have articles on people who volunteer at shelters caring for the homeless, even if they do it for many years. We have articles on major scientists but not the many minor ones who work away contributing to the ground swell of knowledge that allows those major scientists to make the leaps of thought they're notable for. We have articles on the astronauts who rode in rockets to the moon but very few of the engineers who built those rockets merit an article. Society, as a whole, sometimes idolises the strangest people. What you see here is, to some extent, a reflection of that strange idolisation. Be that as it may, if you still don't believe that the article belongs here, you can register an account and nominate the article for deletion here. Ka Faraq Gatri (talk) 12:42, 11 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
