Talk:Kelsey Wakefield

Latest comment: 1 year ago by AirshipJungleman29 in topic GA Reassessment
Former good articleKelsey Wakefield was one of the Sports and recreation good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 21, 2012Good article nomineeListed
June 7, 2023Good article reassessmentDelisted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on March 2, 2012.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Australian Stinger Kelsey Wakefield took a year off university in order to try to make the 2012 Summer Olympics in water polo?
Current status: Delisted good article

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Kelsey Wakefield/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Ruby2010 (talk · contribs) 00:07, 21 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I will be this article's reviewer. Ruby 2010/2013 00:07, 21 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Comments

edit
Lead
  • "She has been a member of the Australia women's national water polo team at the junior and senior level" - this could be better specified by gauging the time (amt of years or span of years)
  • Also, I think placing the tournaments in the order they were played would be better (2010, 2011)
  • The lead also could use a copyedit (each sentence starts with "she" a lot, which is hard on the eyes)
  • When did she win "a championship as a member of the Brisbane Barracudas in the National Water Polo League"? (you give so many years already, that it seems odd not to have one for this championship)
  • What does "the junior and senior level" mean? I don't intend for you to add unnecessary detail, but are there any wikilinks you could input here to aid readers?
      • Not sure how to fix this other than creating an article for the Australian women's national under-20 team, which could probably be written that way. But yeah, one is an open team for the top players regardless of age who compete in all events. (Hence, senior.) The juniors are an age restricted development squad that feed to the senior team. (They also compete internationally and represent the country.) --LauraHale (talk) 03:46, 21 April 2012 (UTC)Reply
Personal life
Water polo

I'm glad you've chosen to focus on female athletics; you've really been productively editing! I don't think this article needs too much extra work to bring it to GA, so I'll place it on hold for seven days. You can respond here when you've finished adding your improvements. Thanks, Ruby 2010/2013 02:20, 21 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

I'm satisfied with your changes. Passing the article for GA. Nice work! Ruby 2010/2013 05:14, 21 April 2012 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Kelsey Wakefield. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:34, 4 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kelsey Wakefield. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:49, 8 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

GA Reassessment

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: Delisted, no improvement. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 01:02, 7 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

11 years since listed as GA. Article is not up to date as missing career information since 2012. LibStar (talk) 00:53, 5 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Do not close until June, to prevent topic overload for willing editors.~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 11:55, 15 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.