Talk:Kemble, Gloucestershire
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Kemble, Gloucestershire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061015012900/http://beehive.thisisgloucestershire.co.uk/default.asp?WCI=SiteHome&ID=2538&PageID=11435 to http://beehive.thisisgloucestershire.co.uk/default.asp?WCI=SiteHome&ID=2538&PageID=11435
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:23, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
Requested move 15 August 2018
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Withdrawn, I found one in Canada. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:39, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
– We currently have this village and an article on the family which gets less views [[1]] and is already naturally disambiguated and the other surname holders. The surname derives from the village. A hatnote could be added for the family and the surname article per WP:TWODABS. Crouch, Swale (talk) 09:55, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose. Kemble, Gloucestershire sounds like a place. "Kemble" sounds like a person. The current set up works. Read WP:TITLECHANGES. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 10:51, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
- Sounds like a person? How? WP:TWODABS would work well enough in this situation considering we don't have content for the surname and the family gets less views as well as the long term significance of the place. Crouch, Swale (talk) 12:35, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
- Hatnotes, clutter at the top of the page, so that you can have a shorter less useful title and more title whitspace? No. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:40, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- The title Kemble is more useful, its simpler and I have provided evidence that this is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC for the term Kemble. It is highly likely—much more likely than any other single topic, and more likely than all the other topics combined—to be the topic sought when a reader searches for Kemble (especially as it appears to family is commonly called Kemble family) and has substantially greater enduring notability and educational value than any other topic associated with that term due to the fact that the village has been there for hundreds of years and will probably still be there long after the people are forgotten about as well as being where they derive from. I also don't see how TITLECHANGES applies, this is not a particularly controversial title and is being discussed here as recommended. Crouch, Swale (talk) 05:21, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
- Hatnotes, clutter at the top of the page, so that you can have a shorter less useful title and more title whitspace? No. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:40, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- Sounds like a person? How? WP:TWODABS would work well enough in this situation considering we don't have content for the surname and the family gets less views as well as the long term significance of the place. Crouch, Swale (talk) 12:35, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.