Talk:Ken Block (politician)
A fact from Ken Block (politician) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 15 March 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Master lever sourcing
editIn the "Master Lever" section especially there is some prose that confuses what is being attributed to Block or others with what is being stated as fact. In particular, the sentence "The master lever also created an unfair advantage for majority political parties at the expense of minority and third-parties." is stated as if it were a fact, but is uncited. It looks to me as if this is the opinion of Block, or perhaps of the Moderate Party or others seeking removal of the "master lever" option. If so, it needs to be clearly attributed. That whole paragraph blurs from attributed opinion to what look like statements of fact, but are probably continued opinion. This needs to be fixed. DES (talk) 11:08, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
The above is modified from a post of mine on the help desk. In response the original article drafter, 72.74.204.125, wrote: "The claim "The master lever also created an unfair advantage for majority political parties at the expense of minority and third-parties." is sourced to Politifact.com, WarwickOnline.com.
" Unfortunately, this isn't correct. Neither of these articles mention any effect of the "master lever" option on minority party or 3rd party candidates. They do mention effects on "non-partison" candidates, that is candidates for offices such as School boards where no candidate is formally nominated by any party, but that is a different thing. And even if those articles supported that claim, no inline citation is currently provided to say so. DES (talk) 11:08, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
Here's two sources I've found.
- "Republicans and third-party candidates have long complained that the master lever confuses voters and hurts their chances in the heavily Democratic state.", RI Moderate Party aims to ban "master lever" (The Providence Journal)
- "Many republicans and third party candidates have said the master lever confuses voters and puts them at a disadvantage because of the high number of registered Democrats in the state.", "Bill To Eliminate Straight Party Option" (WPRI)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Ken Block (politician). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://moderate-ri.org/news/state_ofthestate.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:49, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Ken Block (politician). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.foxprovidence.com/rhode-show/coffee-with-the-candidates-ken-block-for-governor - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131118174445/http://www.wpri.com/target-12/tim-white/newsmakers-1115-ken-block-republican-candidate-for-governor to http://www.wpri.com/target-12/tim-white/newsmakers-1115-ken-block-republican-candidate-for-governor
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20161101042543/http://thephoenix.com/boston/news/59593-moderate-party-touted-as-an-antidote-for-ris-woes/ to http://thephoenix.com/boston/news/59593-moderate-party-touted-as-an-antidote-for-ris-woes/
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.pawtuckettimes.com/content/block-ri-must-be-fixed - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140301162511/http://wpro-am.fimc.net/Article.asp?id=2323066&spid=37719 to http://wpro-am.fimc.net/Article.asp?id=2323066&spid=37719
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.wpri.com/news/local/providence/providence-fraud-unit-working-to-protect-ri-taxpayers - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160304025019/http://rhodybeat.com/stories/Flawed-RI-business-brand-critiqued-by-RI-Taxpayers-group%2C82012 to http://rhodybeat.com/stories/Flawed-RI-business-brand-critiqued-by-RI-Taxpayers-group%2C82012
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140531123901/http://www.providencejournal.com/opinion/commentary/20131113-ken-block-i-can-save-r.i.-taxpayers-1-billion.ece to http://www.providencejournal.com/opinion/commentary/20131113-ken-block-i-can-save-r.i.-taxpayers-1-billion.ece
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://blockforgovernor.com/news/kbfg_news.php?id=6&cat_id=&p=
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:38, 4 May 2017 (UTC)