Talk:Kenan Harkin
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph of Kenan Harkin be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
360
editI don't think [1] can be accepted as a reliable source. The name in question, Zach Shaw, is listed as one of the sources for the page, meaning the only source for the claim is this Zach Shaw person himself. Green-eyed girl (Talk · Contribs) 20:19, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
And I'd like to advise 123.243.35.22 not to simply remove material he does not like. If you want to discuss about the 360, I'm open to it, but those edits took out material unrelated to that, for no apparent reason. Green-eyed girl (Talk · Contribs) 20:23, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
www.google.com/q=zach+shaw+360+backflip
Note also that he was referred to as a pioneer but no mention as to why, and that the claims I removed were false too. I'm not terribly concerned with providing references, as a quick Google or flick through a BMX history contradicts these claims. I'm more concerned with accurate information being presented. 123.243.35.22 (talk) 01:27, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
- If anything in the article is not backed by sources, you are certainly free to challenge it by adding something like {{cn}}. It's generally advisable to flat-out remove only if the content in question is highly dubious _and_ highly contentious. Frankly, adding "incorrectly credited" and "oh it was actually Zach Shaw" is what's contentious. If you're making claims, it's on you to cite them. Obviously, the links present when I first wrote this article were all live at the time, so if there's anything that seems unreferenced, it's a recent development. I'll take a close look at the article tomorrow sometime (too tired now, been real busy IRL the last few days) to see what, if anything, needs improvement. And remember that the threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth. We have to go by what the sources say. And making contentious edits and shirking the responsibility of sourcing them, while removing content wholesale at the same time, is not really the way to go about things. Green-eyed girl (Talk · Contribs) 03:39, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Kenan Harkin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081006070257/http://www.ussx.com/news/tvteam.asp to http://www.ussx.com/news/tvteam.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:23, 28 January 2016 (UTC)