This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
Compton State Of Mind
editCompton State Of Mind, Compton State Of Mind Part Two,The New West... (There are more of these). What are they? Are they mixtapes? 78.151.174.244 (talk) 22:47, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
He has released a bunch of other mixtapes also inclunding
the rose that grew from the concrete,
he Poems Of Kendrick Lamar,
Compton state of mind,
Training day,
C4,
Black Hippy (with schoolboy, jayrock, and absoul)
Youngest Head Nigga In Charge,
and some others i cant remember. This page is incomplete without listing these but i am unsure how to list them
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Kendrick Lamar discography. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20140626110133/https://itunes.apple.com/us/album/these-days.../id889248321 to https://itunes.apple.com/us/album/these-days.../id889248321
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:56, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Kendrick Lamar discography. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131012053909/https://itunes.apple.com/gb/album/let-us-move-on-feat.-kendrick/id588439054 to https://itunes.apple.com/gb/album/let-us-move-on-feat.-kendrick/id588439054
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131203005452/http://www.aplusfilmz.com/portfolios/black-hippy-say-wassup/ to http://www.aplusfilmz.com/portfolios/black-hippy-say-wassup/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:16, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Kendrick Lamar discography. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131202233101/http://thesource.com/2011/12/29/videodroop-eftkendricklamar-rossiwinefreemymind/ to http://thesource.com/2011/12/29/videodroop-eftkendricklamar-rossiwinefreemymind/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:34, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Split
editThere is a clear consensus against a split of Kendrick Lamar discography to Kendrick Lamar albums discography and Kendrick Lamar songs discography.
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Support split - Kendrick Lamar discography is over 100 kB, and should be split to Kendrick Lamar albums discography and Kendrick Lamar songs discography. Thoughts? --Jax 0677 (talk) 16:22, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose – the albums page would be completely unsubstantial compared to the songs page. It would be of no conceivable benefit to split a minuscule albums section from song-related sections that make up the bulk of this page. Ss112 16:43, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
- Reply - I would like to add Kendrick Lamar videography to the list of articles to be split from this page. If we split both the albums and the music videos from the discography, the singles discography article would end up just under 100 kB. The singles discography article can then be subdivided when it becomes too gigantic. With years ahead of him, his discography is likely to grow. --Jax 0677 (talk) 18:25, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
- I'm saying the albums and music videos sections are not worth splitting off into respective separate articles because they are quite small. As it is, the sections besides songs do not merit an article in and of themselves, so splitting them off wouldn't help load times for any readers considering they add very little to the bulk of the page—which is songs. This suggestion is coming too soon. Suggest it in a few years when Kendrick has years more releases under his belt. It seems like you're trying to split this up like Lil Wayne's discography, which is one of the most terrible splits that's happened on this website. Now readers have to navigate five different pages if they want to read about all his releases. That is not the best solution for every page, no matter how large. Ss112 03:09, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
- Reply - @Ss112:, Lil Wayne singles discography was well over 100 kB, and needed to be subdivided. It is linked properly in the navigation boxes, and was discussed prior to doing so. Splitting the article would shorten the singles article by more than 25%. --Jax 0677 (talk) 16:47, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
- Still disagree; that's not much of a decrease in page size or load time. You didn't get consensus for the Lil Wayne single page split, and there are still plenty of reference errors on those discography pages you are yet to fix. Ss112 16:48, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
- Reply - @Ss112:, I am open to suggestions regarding the names. Because people opposed splitting the discographies for Linkin Park, Metallica and Pearl Jam, I refrained from doing so. I am working on fixing the references. WRT Lil Wayne singles discography, I got agreement from @Nikki Lee 1999:, with no objections at all for more than one month. --Jax 0677 (talk) 19:01, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
- Still disagree; that's not much of a decrease in page size or load time. You didn't get consensus for the Lil Wayne single page split, and there are still plenty of reference errors on those discography pages you are yet to fix. Ss112 16:48, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
- Reply - @Ss112:, Lil Wayne singles discography was well over 100 kB, and needed to be subdivided. It is linked properly in the navigation boxes, and was discussed prior to doing so. Splitting the article would shorten the singles article by more than 25%. --Jax 0677 (talk) 16:47, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
- I'm saying the albums and music videos sections are not worth splitting off into respective separate articles because they are quite small. As it is, the sections besides songs do not merit an article in and of themselves, so splitting them off wouldn't help load times for any readers considering they add very little to the bulk of the page—which is songs. This suggestion is coming too soon. Suggest it in a few years when Kendrick has years more releases under his belt. It seems like you're trying to split this up like Lil Wayne's discography, which is one of the most terrible splits that's happened on this website. Now readers have to navigate five different pages if they want to read about all his releases. That is not the best solution for every page, no matter how large. Ss112 03:09, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose – He only had 4 studio albums. Most split discography articles on Wikipedia are for artists who have a very large number of albums and have been making music much longer. AgWoolridge (talk) 18:02, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose- It is too early in his career for this debate. It may be necessary to do this in the future, but this article is not that long yet. There are many discography articles which are longer and haven't been split. Lilandyben (talk) 16:02, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose - As others already pointed out, four albums would make that other article too short. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 23:04, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose – Lamar has only released four studio albums within a span of one decade. From works I have seen, albums discography lists are better suited for artists' careers spanning three or more decades. Carbrera (talk) 20:53, 11 October 2018 (UTC).
- The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.