Talk:Kensington Palace

Untitled

Do Prince and Princess Michael still life there, or have they been turfed out? Astrotrain 15:29, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Hmm, well [1] says it's their London Residence and office. Don't know how current it is though. Make of it what you like. Biofoundationsoflanguage 19:12, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

I remember reading that they were moving out, but wasn't sure if it was just media hype or not. I quite like Princess Michael though. Astrotrain 10:27, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

I think I might've heard something along those lines too.

I've tried googling it but all I've found so far is that they can stay there, subsidised by Her Majesty until 2009. Maybe they have, or are about to, leave prematurely? about half way down, though this is from 2003! Biofoundationsoflanguage 16:25, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

Given the royal website still says they life there, then we should go by that. Thanks for the links Astrotrain 23:51, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

cottages at KP

Should it be noted that the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge actually live in Nottingham Cottage and that K.P. is really a series of buildings, including Wren House, where the Duke and Duchess of Kent reside? It's gotten enough media coverage. 74.69.127.200 (talk) 13:19, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Missing origins

The article doesn't give any indication of when the palace was first built, or who built it. It'd be very useful, if anyone can add this in (I can't, I fear...). Nick Michael (talk) 22:05, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Done. Textorus (talk) 13:22, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Kensington Palace. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20050331004503/http://www.time.com:80/time/daily/special/diana/readingroom/8191/4_25.html to http://www.time.com/time/daily/special/diana/readingroom/8191/4_25.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:17, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

mistress to lover

The article said a window was blocked up to stop Lord Lorne escaping to visit his mistress. But the footnote doesn't say that - just that he had "assignations". Lorne was long rumoured to be gay. If so his assignations would not have been with a mistress. I changed the sentence from the gender-specific "mistress" to the gender-neutral "lover". FearÉIREANN\^(caint) 13:41, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kensington Palace. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110901223028/http://www.hrp.org.uk/aboutus/whoweare/default.aspx to http://www.hrp.org.uk/aboutus/whoweare/default.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:34, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Origin story problems

The house can’t have been purchased in 1619 by a man who wasn’t born until the end of 1620. Provided citation does not currently include any details on its purchase despite being appended to that sentence. Not sure how to fix this other than delete the sentence/citation which doesn’t seem optimal. 108.56.131.150 (talk) 20:07, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Flowers for Princess Diana's Funeral.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 06:22, 29 May 2022 (UTC)