Talk:Kent vs Lancashire at Canterbury/GA1
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Adam Cuerden (talk · contribs) 14:44, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
First of all, a mathematical error: 14/18*100% is 77.77777777...%, this rounds to 77.78%, not 77.77%.
A spot check found a little bit of close paraphrasing:
| Source | Article |
|---|---|
| Tayler's painting was finished towards the end of the 1907 season, by which time 192 engravings had been pre-ordered - providing more than enough income to pay all the artist's fees before Kent had even taken delivery of the original. | |
| Tayler finished the painting in 1907. By that time, 192 engravings of the painting had been pre-ordered, which ensured that Tayler's fees were covered. |
That's a bit problematic, though it's borderline, not definitely across the line. Still, a copyedit to reduce that would help a lot. I should probably do a full source check, though, given that, but I'll wait until you give the all-clear. Adam Cuerden (talk) 15:24, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
- @Adam Cuerden: I've changed the wording and fixed the percentages. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 22:01, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
- I've done some spot checks and failed to find any more close paraphrasing. I'm quite happy to promote this. Adam Cuerden (talk) 11:21, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
Promoted.
There is a bit more information in the sources, by the way, so it might be good to expand this a bit more before FA. Adam Cuerden (talk) 11:23, 21 June 2014 (UTC)