Talk:Kenwood Corporation

"The difference is the "K" stylized in red, instead of the Kenwood (Electronics) Corporation with a stylized "W" in red." - An illustration would be pretty useful. --Oop 15:02, 10 November 2005 (UTC)

company infobox added

I added the company infobox. It is very hard to find the operating income and revenue figures. I have used Google finance and Yahoo finance to source the information.

--Visik 14:11, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

Missing TS-520

This is a great article! But where is mention of the TS-520 ? This radio is arguably one of the most remembered and appreciated Kenwood rigs of all time. Even today this transceiver can sell for $500+ at a hamfest. It sold new for $325! While the other models were great radios in their own right, the TS-520 ranks alongside the TS-930 in esteem in the amateur radio community of the 80's, and 90's. I am new to the Wiki and would like to contribute. So perhaps once I get my bearings I can contribute a couple of lines about this famous radio.

--Parthian Macgregor 15:26, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

I agree. The TS-520 seems to be a legitimate predecessor to the TS-820. Ferritecore (talk) 01:27, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Fhandscombe (talk) 12:38, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

I am very new to Wikipedia but not to Amateur Radio or Trio-Kenwood equipment

The TS500 series goes back a lot further than the TS520. It is predated by the TS500, TS510 and TS515 in that order

Also the TS900 series began with the TS900, a very expensive and well specified transciever from the mid 70s I believe

There is also the total ommission of the "Kenwood Twins", separate transmitter and receiver. There were I believe 3 versions of this, T- and R-599 in two models (silver and a brown/gold front panel), and the TX- and JR-599 which came earlier. I am not 100% certain of these model numbers; they may have just been different designations for the European and US markets. 73 Fred G4BWP

If you feel the TS-520 needs to be here, why not write it? That's the whole point about Wikipedia. Drkirkby (talk) 07:37, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

Splitting of article

I see no discussion, no consensus and no need for this split and I am reintegrating the article. Please discuss and achieve consensus before making such major changes. GlassFET 17:36, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Limited Information Here

Kenwood is such a storied company in the audio world it is a shame there is almost no information about the brand on Wikip. other than the short synopsis on the orgin of the firm. Please consider adding informaton about their important hi-fi models, the Accuphase spin-off, and mention that test equipment was also produced. Anyone? 99.32.160.175 (talk) 03:33, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kenwood Corporation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150320224453/http://www.jvckenwood.co.jp/en/press/2015/01/press_150130_04.pdf to http://www.jvckenwood.co.jp/en/press/2015/01/press_150130_04.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:47, 24 December 2017 (UTC)