Talk:Kepler-10c/GA1

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 15:58, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Here are the issues I found with this article:

• "In January 2011, some four months prior" prior to the discovery? It's mentioned in the lead but starting off with that's still a bit odd, I'd just remove the 4 months part.
  • It still felt awkward after removing the 4 months portion, so I nixed the whole phrase. How does it look? --Starstriker7^(Talk) 00:20, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
• "allowed the Kepler team to rule out the majority alternatives" majority of the alternatives
  •  Done --Starstriker7^(Talk) 00:20, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
• link triple star system.
  •  Done --Starstriker7^(Talk) 00:20, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
• Per MoS, don't have Ref #4's title in all-caps.
  • All set. --Starstriker7^(Talk) 00:20, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

I'll put the article on hold and pass when the issues are fixed. Should only take like 5 minutes to modify so nothing big. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 15:58, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Everything looks good now, so I'll pass the article as a GA. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 01:55, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

---

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.