Talk:Kepler-8b/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 17:38, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: two found and fixed.[1] Jezhotwells (talk) 17:46, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 17:48, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   I made a few minor copy-edits

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   Sources check out, RS, no OR

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   As much detail as is currently available about an object so far away. Undoubtedly there will be more information in time.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Tagged and captioned.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   I have no hesitation in listing this. Congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 18:04, 20 March 2011 (UTC)