Talk:Kepler (microarchitecture)

Minor grammar error

[...] , it doubled the CUDA Cores from 16 to 32 per CUDA array. With the addition CUDA core solve the warp execution problem, the SMX processing resources are also double with warp schedulers, [...]

I am not native in English but seems like broken grammar to me.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Kepler (microarchitecture). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20130614205336/http://nvidianews.nvidia.com/Releases/NVIDIA-Launches-First-GeForce-GPUs-Based-on-Next-Generation-Kepler-Architecture-79b.aspx to http://nvidianews.nvidia.com/Releases/NVIDIA-Launches-First-GeForce-GPUs-Based-on-Next-Generation-Kepler-Architecture-79b.aspx
• Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.brightsideofnews.com/news/2012/11/21/nvidia-doesnt-fully-support-directx-111-with-kepler-gpus2c-bute280a6.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 15:37, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

"spurr polygon"

This is a typo, but I'm not sure how to fix it. Until Special:Diff/645796420 the text here used to say "...capable of spurring out a polygon...", but I don't know what that means either. Anyone? -- John of Reading (talk) 12:03, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

Most of that paragraph seems to have been written by a drunk 8 year old from Siberia who was also claiming that his AOL dial-up had "blast capacity". Most of the processor terminology is basically invented, numbers are being spouted with no reference, TANSTAAFL so doubling computer core count and register file size almost certainly didn't achieve a 90% power usage reduction without a massive die shrink and the previous model was already a mixed 40nm / 28nm process. I'm going to kill it with fire. A Shortfall Of Gravitas (talk) 05:58, 22 March 2024 (UTC)