Talk:Kestrel K-350
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Free Use vs Fair Use Images availability
editThere are plenty of photographs and images available for Farnborough/Kestrel Aircraft including many of the prototype, in at least two different paint schemes, but none that are Free Use. Air to air publicity photos and videos (where screen shots could be captured) are also available, but would these be Fair Use, and is Fair Use acceptable for this article? For now the "two-view" .svg drawing will have to suffice... it can be improved and kept, maybe as a standard "three-view", when appropriate photographs are obtained for the article. I may endeavor to obtain photographs since the Brunswick facility is not far away, however this naval airbase is still active and closed to the general public until May 2011.truthdowser (talk) 15:33, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
Sources and specs
editSeveral of the cite links go nowhere, or seem to. The important ref 13 (since that's where the specs come from) does link, but where are the specs? Must be there somewhere but I could not find them.
I think having two engine entries is very confusing, for the specs can only apply to one variant (the prototype here, presumably since there is no mention of estimates) and that is single engined, with the P&W.
There's a set of significantly different specs in Jane's 2011/12 (agrees on dimensions) based on the P&W enegine that could be used.TSRL (talk) 21:39, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Kestrel K-350. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for //www.farnborough-aircraft.com/TheF1aircraft.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:39, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
