Talk:Keurig Dr Pepper

Latest comment: 1 year ago by 2600:8801:0:2B10:21D5:1FCB:2705:E1D3 in topic Reads like an ad

WikiProject Food and drink Tagging

edit

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and careful attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 23:14, 3 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

There has been quite a good deal of publicity over Green Mountains' accounting practices in recent months. This press-release style article said nothing on point. I added a single-sentence statement just now, but more work will be needed. --Christofurio (talk) 15:06, 18 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Why condense the section about the sale of the company?

edit

I don't have time to figure out who condensed this new Acquisition section or why.

But would you not agree that 90% of people who come to this article on Wikipedia do so because they are interested in that part of the topic? Why not give them MORE information instead of less? Peter K Burian 01:12, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

See WP:NOTNEWS. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a newspaper. We only post very salient information of encyclopedic and lasting merit. Nor do we repeat redundant information that is already in this Wikipedia article. Softlavender (talk) 03:28, 9 December 2015 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Keurig Green Mountain. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:32, 9 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Why the hyphen in "East Coast?

edit

To user Softlavender: Re: "It is manufactured by the American company Keurig Dr Pepper via its east-coast headquarters in Burlington, Massachusetts." Why do wee need the hyphen in that word 'east-coast'? It isn't really necessary. Let's just stay calm here and not have a conniption, please. Johnnysama (talk) 11:31, 31 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

It's not "East Coast". It's not a proper name, not the name of the division. It is a division on the east coast. Used as an adjective, the two words require a hyphen, as all two-word adjectives (or compound adjectives) do. [1]. -- Softlavender (talk) 11:37, 31 August 2018 (UTC)Reply
Grk1011 said on the Keurig page: "I don't like it being capitalized either, but East Coast is a proper noun in its article." Look, I didn't mean to raise anyone's hackles here, but I didn't want to argue or get complantive here, okay? I just feel like we had a disagreement, and I kinda sided with Grk1011 on this. Maybe we should all calm down get a consensus. Johnnysama (talk) 17:52, 13 September 2018 (UTC)Reply
And I refuted him. Softlavender (talk) 17:53, 13 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Removal of uncited text

edit

I have a removed an uncited and unverifiable claim about a merger from this article, Mondelez International, Jacobs Douwe Egberts, and Peet's Coffee. Another similar edit by the same user on Kraft Heinz has already been reverted for the same reason. Feel free to restore if you can find a reputable source. DDFoster96 (talk) 12:23, 1 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

"Select Beverages" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Select Beverages and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 4#Select Beverages until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 17:00, 4 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Reads like an ad

edit

This article reads like a corporate ad given to prospective vendors, from my experience as long-time business owner. Nearly word for word. 2600:8801:0:2B10:21D5:1FCB:2705:E1D3 (talk) 12:13, 1 March 2023 (UTC)Reply