Talk:Kevin Plawecki

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Editosaurus in topic Dildo incident
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kevin Plawecki. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:44, 5 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Dildo incident

edit

Questions: 1. Does the Kevin Plawecki dildo incident deserve coverage in the article? 2. Does the previously-written coverage on this violate WP:BLP? I would contend yes and no (although there may be a point about WP:SYNTH, although I think it's 50/50). Editosaurus (talk) 23:33, 8 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

(1) A dildo in a locker creates sensationalist coverage, which is not what Wikipedia is about. (2) It's clear that speculating about this dildo being related to Matt Harvey's suspension is WP:OR / WP:SYNTH, and therefore a BLP violation. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:36, 8 May 2017 (UTC)Reply
I'm not speculating that the dildo is related to the Harvey suspension --- in fact, I sought to clarify that the two were not related --- I merely am making an acknowledgement of the speculation that had to be cleared up about this subject. As the Mets org (incl. through beat writers) specifically stated that the two were not related, then, setting aside the notability of the dildo incident, the Harvey speculation being cleared up deserves mention. Editosaurus (talk) 23:38, 8 May 2017 (UTC)Reply