Talk:Kevin Sandkuhler
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Kevin Sandkuhler article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wikipedia articles must be based on reliable sources to establish notability, and the author has not provided any ... without them, this is just original research, which is prohibited by official policy. —72.75.73.158 04:36, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
No improvements
editWhat makes a Marine Corps lawyer involved in discussions about abuses at GITMO notable enough to have an article in Wikipedia? Please see the notability criteria in WP:BIO and WP:BLP ... I fail to see how the subject is (my emphasis added)
... notable for his participation in discusssions, in December of 2002, of reports that interrogators ... were using controversial interrogation techniques on the captives held in the Guantanamo Bay detention camps, in Cuba.
Anyway, that's why I plan to put a {{prod}}
on it Real Soon Now ... Happy Editing! —68.239.79.82 (talk · contribs) 21:55, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
Looking better!
editWell, it's starting to look Much Better! Kudos to Geo Swan (talk · contribs) :-)
I've upgraded the {{WPBiography}}
class from Stub
to Start
, and I've removed the {{Primarysources}}
tag ... also tweaked the new Awards section ... I'll come back in a few days (trying to avoid edit conflicts) to clean once more before it's time to MOVE ON.
BTW ... still waiting to remove the date/place of birth categories from this article ... it's kind of a litmus test for WP:ATT, i.e., "he's notable enough that someone has researched and published his date and place of birth", so it's trivial to have them in the opening sentence of a biographical article ... usually the first red flag when I'm on New page patrol.
If anyone is interested, I'd appreciated some feedback on What to do when a speedy delete tag is removed ... feel free to edit it for grammar or content ... opposing views/examples welcome. —68.239.79.82 02:26, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Kevin Sandkuhler. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070513034622/http://www.pinkertons.com/news.htm to http://www.pinkertons.com/news.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061122025446/http://www.commondreams.org/headlines05/0804-07.htm to http://www.commondreams.org/headlines05/0804-07.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:40, 22 September 2017 (UTC)