Talk:Khadim Hussain Rizvi

Latest comment: 1 month ago by Cowboygilbert in topic Semi-protected edit request on 26 September 2024

Semi-protected edit request on 26 November 2018

edit

Allama Khadim Hussain Rizvi, M.P.D.S is a learned religious scholar who holds a Master degree in Planning and Development Studies (PDS). He graduated from the university in 1989, after which he moved to Pakistan to pursue religion as his permanent field of study. MuhammadAdil1005 (talk) 20:25, 26 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. DannyS712 (talk) 20:31, 26 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Titles

edit

The article, as it currently reads, calls Rizvi "founding chairman and chief Dalla of Tehreek-e-Labbaik Pakistan". I took a look at the supporting source,[1] and it indicates that Rizvi filed to establish "his party, TLYRA". I think we're comfortable to call him founding chairman.

The second title is the one that concerns me. I couldn't find anything in the source that mentions him as "chief Dalla" or "chief warrior". What source do we have for those titles? Or, in the absence of a reliable source and following the guidance of WP:BLP, should we remove that? —C.Fred (talk) 18:56, 18 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 19 November 2020

edit

Some of his books include:

Tayaseer Abwab-ul-Sarf (تیسر ابواب الصرف), Maktba Majadia Sultania, 2013, 680 p.

This books tries to make it convenient for subcontinental students to learn Arabic from a grammatical perspective to enable them to benefit from Scripture in a personal and intelligent way. Tahawi Naqshbandi (talk) 17:05, 19 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

  Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ‑‑ElHef (Meep?) 17:36, 19 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

he come back

edit

he come to life again. like undertaker

Response from me to you: Those were rumors! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 39.32.222.63 (talk) 15:47, 30 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Funeral Ceremony Of Allama Khadim Hussain Rizvi

edit

An Australian Report Shows That 1 Crore 70 Lakh People Attended The Event ...So Correct Your Information SibtainAli786 (talk) 14:47, 19 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

SibtainAli786 No Source states that so it cannot be added Jibran1998 (talk) 16:38, 19 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Cyclist Irfan Bhacher Multan

edit

I'm big fan of Allama Khadim Hussain Rizvi Cyclist Irfan Bhacher (talk) 07:08, 28 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 7 January 2021

edit
RizviSpeeches (talk) 16:52, 7 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khadim_Hussain_Rizvi#cite_note-30

  Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Terasail[✉] 17:45, 7 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

How Many People's in the Funeral of Allama Khadim Hussain Rizvi

edit

In the Funeral of Allama Khadim Hussain Rizvi, more 14 Million people gathered. The report of Only 200,000 is totally fake. The area of "Iqbal Park" is "1.33km square". And in this area, more than 14 Million people can stand at a time. And Iqbal park was full of people. The "Badshahi Mosque" in the neighbor of Iqbal park, was also full of people with more than 150,000 people in it. Hundreds of Thousands of people prayed the prayer on the road, outside the Iqbal park, because there was no more place to enter more people in the park. Therefore, the Number of only 200,000 is 100% false. Please note, and share authentic information. Notice : More than 14 Million people were in the funeral of Allama Khadim Hussain Rizvi. Aurangzaib1829 (talk) 00:10, 8 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Aurangzaib1829: What's your source for that figure? The cited source only says "thousands of people", not even the 200k number currently in the article. —C.Fred (talk) 00:38, 8 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

An article on Tehreek-e-Labbaik Pakistan's own website claims 17,500,000 attended the funeral, see WP:ABOUTSELF, this is clearly self-serving and an exceptional claim given Reuters cite a local official who says 200,000. I have removed the claim. FDW777 (talk)

Approximately more then 17000000 people attend his funeral, I can give you the prove, you can check this funeral many people are in jinnah park many are on roads many are on bridge, you yourself should check it out AbdulRehman11122 (talk) 11:52, 18 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Just go and see drone footage on youtube, millions of people are present there, if you dont want to change this then you dont have any right to but khadim Hussain Razvi article on wikipedia AbdulRehman11122 (talk) 11:53, 18 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

So no references then? Good, the article won't be changed. FDW777 (talk) 12:58, 18 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
The claimed turnout of greater than 17M people is actually larger than the metro population of Karachi. That would be pretty impressive turnout for the leader of a political party that scraped together about 1/8 that number of votes in the last major election. Extraordinary claims require really, really good references, and drone footage from Youtube doesn't cut it. PohranicniStraze (talk) 17:54, 18 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
It's been non-stop here and at List of largest funerals. A quick sample of proper references.
  • Yahoo Officials did not immediately provide a crowd size but local observers estimated several hundred thousand attendees
  • Deutsche Welle Tens of thousands
  • Dawn Thousands of people
  • The News International Tens of thousands of mourners
  • The Express Tribune Thousands attended the funeral prayers
You'd think one of them might have noticed if there were really 17,000,000 people there.... FDW777 (talk) 18:05, 18 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
Also given the eight different IPs and two accounts trying to inflate the figure in the last 24 hours, I suspect there's some off-wiki encouragement happening. Let's hope all 17,000,000 don't try it... FDW777 (talk) 18:12, 18 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

No surprises that the semi-protection has expired and there are more attempts to inflate the attendance. Strange how nobody was interested in discussing it here over the last three months isn't it? FDW777 (talk) 15:41, 19 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

People in minar e Pakistan

edit

70 to 80 lakh people offerd namaz e janaza you write wrong number Muhammad Ahmad 11717 (talk) 13:58, 1 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

See #How Many People's in the Funeral of Allama Khadim Hussain Rizvi. FDW777 (talk) 15:03, 1 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 6 June 2021

edit

[2] Khadim Hussain Rizvi Hafiz Saad Hussain rizvi MG ghulam (talk) 08:22, 6 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Not done. See MOS:ISLAMHON. FDW777 (talk) 08:32, 6 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

AllamaKhadimHussainRizvi funeral

edit

More than 15000000 people attended the funeral of Allama Khadim Hussain Rizvi RA. Mohsinaltaf106 (talk) 07:22, 7 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Boring. FDW777 (talk) 07:28, 7 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 24 December 2021

edit

Add PBUH(Peace Be Upon Him) before or after my Prophet MUHAMMAD (PBUH) Name Mubarak in Start...! Muhammad Umair-Young Enterpreneur (talk) 20:29, 24 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Not done: See WP:PBUH Cannolis (talk) 20:36, 24 December 2021 (UTC)Reply


Request

edit

AllamaKhadimHussainRizvi funeral attendees update on Saad Arshad's Request

edit

Please check these sources
1. https://www.geo.tv/latest/323671-does-the-tehreek-e-labbaik-have-a-political-future-without-khadim-hussain-rizvi
2. https://www.ucanews.com/news/hardline-islamic-cleric-even-had-catholic-admirers-in-pakistan/90420#
3. https://news.kuwaittimes.net/website/huge-maskless-crowd-gathers-for-pakistani-firebrand-clerics-funeral/

1. Last month in Lahore, a mammoth crowd gathered at the historic Minar-e-Pakistan for Rizvi’s funeral. As per some estimates, one million people were in attendance, which may be one of the largest gatherings at the monument in recent history.

2. Rizvi’s funeral on Nov. 21 was said to be the biggest funeral in the history of Lahore. Human rights activists expressed their concern at the show of muscle by religious extremists. The attendance of more than a million included some clerics from the interfaith group of Archbishop Sebastian Shaw of Lahore and several NGOs.

These are saying more than 1 Million people attended the funeral. Both are verified news channels — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saad Arshad Butt (talkcontribs)

The first source is clearly marked as being in the opinion section of geo.tv. The second is an opinion piece with a publisher's disclaimer at the end that it does not represent the editorial opinion of the publisher. —C.Fred (talk) 02:25, 27 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
Show me from where you got this information that 200K people were in funeral? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saad Arshad Butt (talkcontribs) 02:32, 27 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
The Reuters source, which is cited in the article, although arguably it should be "tens of thousands"; the 200,000 figure goes to an unnamed local official.[3]C.Fred (talk) 02:38, 27 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
Nothing more than hate & political victimization
This is also opinion piece of that unknown person............... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saad Arshad Butt (talkcontribs) 02:47, 27 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
Reuters is a well-respected news service with a strong reputation for fact checking. Hence, it meets the WP:RS criteria. —C.Fred (talk) 04:02, 27 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
I note this reference did not support the claim added to the article. FDW777 (talk) 08:16, 27 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 4 January 2022

edit
49.224.121.189 (talk) 04:14, 4 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

More than 1,800,000 people attended funeral

  Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Cannolis (talk) 04:56, 4 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

"Rizvi has refused to condemn alleged sexual abuse in Pakistani madrassas."

edit

The source for this statement is an opinion piece titled "Why Is Raping Kids Inside Madrassas Not ‘Blasphemous’?." It's a short piece that assuse Rizvi of hypocricy for being preoccupied with blasphemy charges against an actor while not commenting on sexual abuses in madrasses; the sentence in question from that source is

I fail to see how this supports the assertion that Rizvi has "refused" to comment on something. I've modified the wording to better reflect what the source actually says. OhNoitsJamie Talk 17:09, 2 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Here is a Twitter video of him defending abuse. I think the new wording is fine, but I think that it's pretty clear he refused to condemn sexual abuse. But I have no strong feelings one way or another. I am just trying to ensure that this page isn't decimated by Rizvi's supporters. Lard Almighty (talk) 17:18, 2 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 29 July 2022

edit

Change "known to protest against any change to Pakistan's blasphemy law" to "known to do violent protests against the conduct of blasphemy against Islam or against any change to strict and controversial Blasphemy Laws of Pakistan[1] itself"[2][3] Change "was a Pakistani Islamic author" to " was a "Pakistani Islamist Politician"[4] Change "the founder of Tehreek-e-Labbaik" to "the founder of far right Islamist organization Tehreeh-e-Labbaik Pakistan (TLP)"[5][6] Change "Section 295-C of the Pakistan Penal Code" to "strict and controversial Section 295-C of the Pakistani Penal Code"[7][8] Betankoetschepfats (talk) 06:56, 29 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{edit semi-protected}} template. This will clearly be contentious. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 11:15, 29 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

References

Semi-protected edit request on 5 July 2023

edit

Please remove "Allama" from the lead and infobox, see the request for comment at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Islam-related_articles/Archive_2#RfC about whether to allow use of honorofic 'Allama' with the names or not? 85.255.233.208 (talk) 07:50, 5 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Done Lightoil (talk) 12:19, 5 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 29 August 2023 (adding Books category)

edit

Hi it's written that he's an author but none of his books are included.

So I wanted to add a "Book" category in between the "Death" and "References" categories, with the following info, thanks:

Some of the books he published include:[1]

  • Tayaseer Abwab-ul-Sarf (تیسر ابواب الصرف), Maktba Majadia Sultania, 2013, 680 p. On facilitating the learning of Arabic grammar.
  • Taleemat-e-Khadimiya (تعلیمات خاد میۃ), Allama Fazal Haaq Publications, 2015, 677 p. On facilitating the learning of Arabic language.
  • Fazail-e-Durood Shareef (فضائل درود شریف), Dajkot, 2018, 332 p. On the spiritual benefits of Durood, quoting scholars such as Abdul Qadir Gilani (1078-1166) and Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyya (1292-1350).

References

  1. ^ "Profile". Marfat Library. Archived from the original on 29 August 2023.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2a02:a03f:64ed:2600:b167:7d27:1b08:1ed1 (talk)

  Done --Stewpot (TᴳRᴴAᴼIˢNᵀ) 19:11, 9 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 31 May 2024

edit

Around 7millon people attended his funeral 2400:ADC7:1146:BF00:9D16:BEE0:8470:E6BE (talk) 17:37, 31 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Jamedeus (talk) 18:09, 31 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Khadim Hussain rizvi funeral

edit

10 million people attend the khadim Hussain rizvi funeral 116.71.184.125 (talk) 00:43, 14 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Per what reliable sources? —C.Fred (talk) 00:46, 14 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 26 September 2024

edit

I believe that the title "امیرالمجاھدین" used in the article is self-given and should not be presented as an established or widely recognized title. Wikipedia guidelines encourage verifiability and neutrality. Unless there is a reliable source confirming this title as widely accepted, it should be removed or attributed properly. I would appreciate feedback on this suggestion.

امیرالمجاھدین خافط خادم حسین رضوی should change to خادم حسین رضوی 2A04:4A43:973F:F815:617E:926C:2F9:1F63 (talk) 21:34, 26 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Not done: I use machine translation, so it might not be as accurate but the title that you linked shows as "Amir Mujahideen", the title is correct as he was an Amir.
Cowboygilbert -  (talk) ♥ 01:05, 27 September 2024 (UTC)Reply