Talk:Khaled Al Maeena

Vandalism

Some character calling himself Egeyemi insists on reverting the text to some previous edit that lacks several bits of up-to-date information (the current king is Salman; who 'was fond' of KA is of no interest to the readers of an an encyclopedia, etc.). I'll report vandalism if it happens again.Sartoresartus (talk) 16:33, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Obvious puff piece

The defensive business about how this guy got his job on his own merit doesn't belong in a Wikipedia article. 97.116.168.45 (talk) 04:16, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

Given the next sentence I conclude that the author was not being completely sincere in his praise of Al-Maeena's 'merits'. However this unquestionably does not belong in a Wikipedia entry.

Still quite funny though. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.81.66.102 (talk) 21:15, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

lol, yes. A whinier and more self-pitying article I have yet to see .....perhaps it IS written by the person concerned ;-) I think it should be deleted right away. What it DOES offer is the useful info that the editor-in-chief of Arab News is government appointed and is hobnobbing it with the very highest and mightiest of this family owned- and run country, really an old-fashioned tyranny, and therefore everything feel-good and unctuous written in Arab News should be doubted and only understood as celebrating the Royals. I correct myself: in some ways a highly useful article, but perhaps not the way the writer(s) intended. Great fun! Steflars2011 (talk) 06:24, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

I agree. It wouldn't take much to improve it, but I think we might as well let it stand. As of Oct. 15 he's no longer in the job, so it doesn't matter anyway.Sartoresartus (talk) 14:00, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Khaled Al Maeena. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111119073625/http://archive.arabnews.com/?page=16&section=4&mode=%2Fwriters%2Fwriters.htm to http://archive.arabnews.com/?page=16&section=4&mode=%2Fwriters%2Fwriters.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:10, 5 May 2017 (UTC)