Talk:Khalid ibn Barmak

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Theleekycauldron in topic Did you know nomination

Dates?

edit

the dates given on britannica and in the book for the mosul revolt don't correspond, there's about a 10 year difference - does anyone have an idea of how to explain? flammifertalk 17:11, 10 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Khalid ibn Barmak/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Ealdgyth (talk · contribs) 13:31, 23 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Time for another Constantine article... I'll get to this one shortly. Ealdgyth (talk) 13:31, 23 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):   d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
  • Lead:
    • "became the foster-brother of the future Harun al-Rashid," future WHAT?
      • Added
  • Origin:
    • link for "Balkh oasis"?
      • There exists no article, and I am not sure one will ever exist, it would be covered in the article on Balkh.
    • short quickie definition for "became a mawlā of the"?
      • the shortest would be 'non-Arab convert to Islam associated with an Arab tribe', which isn't very short. Have added only 'client', which isn't very accurate, but gives enough context.
  • Abbasid revolution:
    • "Soon after, both" soon after what though?
      • Have tried to clarify. The dates are unclear here, but if they came to the court in ca. 725, and Barmak went to Gurgan in ca. 725/6, they did not stay very long.
    • Okay, it's odd to say that Barmak disappears from the record and then the next sentence be that Barmak arranged a marriage. Suggest flipping these sentences.
      • Indeed, done.
  • Under al-Saffah:
    • Shouldn't it be "favour of Caliph al-Saffah "?
      • Fixed
    • "Shortly after he reportedly he assumed the supervision of all fiscal departments" something's garbled here and I can't fix it ...
      • Fixed
    • "the Caliph's son" but "relationship with the caliph was very close"?
      • Fixed
  • Under al-Mansur:
    • "According to a well-known, but likely fabricated, he persuaded" something's missing here?
      • Fixed
    • what was the "Sassanid-era Taq Kasra" - a building? Statue? something else?
      • Clarified
  • I randomly googled three phrases and only turned up Wikipedia mirrors. Earwig's tool shows no sign of copyright violation.
I've put the article on hold for seven days to allow folks to address the issues I've brought up. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, or here with any concerns, and let me know one of those places when the issues have been addressed. If I may suggest that you strike out, check mark, or otherwise mark the items I've detailed, that will make it possible for me to see what's been addressed, and you can keep track of what's been done and what still needs to be worked on. Ealdgyth (talk) 14:32, 23 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Cplakidas: ... any progress? Ealdgyth (talk) 13:57, 26 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hi Ealdgyth, was extremely busy IRL, will deal with this today or over the following few days. Constantine 14:03, 27 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hi Ealdgyth, have endeavoured to address all issues above. Please have a look. Cheers, Constantine 11:19, 1 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
Looks good! Passing this now. Ealdgyth (talk) 13:17, 1 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Did you know nomination

edit
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk11:56, 17 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Improved to Good Article status by Cplakidas (talk). Self-nominated at 14:36, 3 April 2022 (UTC).Reply

Length Newness Cited hook Interest Sources Neutrality Plagiarism/paraphrase
  • First hook is interesting to me. ALT1, not so much.
  • There's currently an error on the Abbas 1988 ref. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 23:12, 3 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • QPQ has been done. Re NPOV, the article lead has "repeatedly distinguished himself for his fairness" (bold added by me for emphasis here) but the article only seem to mention his fairness in respect of edistributing the land tax (kharaj) of Khurasan; there's a later mention of "governing with wisdom and generosity" but that doesn't seem to me quite the same as fairness. Thanks for your work on the article, Cplakidas; let me know when you've fixed the Abbas ref and about my NPOV question. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 23:28, 3 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
ALT0 to T:DYK/P1